Statistical interpretation of transient radial flow in heterogeneous formations

Groundwater Quality Modeling and Management Under Uncertinity

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 13-22

  Copty, Nadim K ^a   Findikakis, Angelos N ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BECHTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PUMPS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CONVENTIONAL PUMPING TEST ANALYSIS; HETEROGENOUS FORMATION; JACOB-COOPER METHOD; TRANSIENT RADIAL FLOW;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

EID: 0242468354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40696(2003)2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Cooper H.H. Jr., and Jacob, C.E. (1946). A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history. Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union 27, 526-534.
2. Copty, N.K. and Findikakis, A.N., (2003). Stochastic Analysis of Pumping Test Drawdown Data in Heterogeneous Geologic Formations, to appear in Journal of Hydraulic Research.
3. Dagan, G. (1986). Statistical theory of groundwater flow and transport: pore to laboratory, laboratory to formation, and formation to regional scale. Water Resources Research 22(9), 120S-134S.
4. Dagan, G. and Neuman, S. (1997). Subsurface Flow and Transport: A Stochastic Approach (International Hydrology Series), Cambridge University Press, Paris, France.
5. Gelhar, L. W. (1993). Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
6. Theis, C. V. (1935). The relation between the lowering of the peizometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union 16, 519-524.