Stochastic inverse modeling for capture zone analysis

Groundwater Quality Modeling and Management Under Uncertinity

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-12

  Jones, N L ^a   Green, J I ^a   Walker, J R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES; ERRORS; GEOPHYSICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY;

CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS; GLOBAL ERROR; STOCHASTIC INVERSE MODELING;

AQUIFERS;

EID: 0242468344     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40696(2003)1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Carle S.F.; Fogg, G.E. (1996). "Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics." Mathematical Geology, 28(4), 453-476.
2. Carle, S.F. (1997a). T-PROGS: Transition Probability Geostatistical Software. Unpublished software and manual (available on request by e-mail to carle1@llnl.gov).
3. Carle, S.F. (1997b). "Implementation schemes for avoiding artifact discontinuities in simulated annealing." Mathematical Geology, 29(2), 231-244.
4. Carle, S.F.; Fogg, G.E. (1997). "Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains." Mathematical Geology, 29(7), 891-918
5. Copty, N. K., and A. N. Findikakis (2000). "Quantitative estimates of the uncertainty in the evaluation of ground water remediation schemes." Ground Water, 38(1), 29-37.
6. Deutsch, C. V., Journel, A. G. (1992). Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, 340 p.
7. Doherty, J. (2000). PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation. Watermark Numerical Computing.
8. Evers, S., and D. N. Lerner. (1998). "How uncertain is our estimate of a wellhead protection zone?" Ground Water, 36(1), 49-57.
9. Green, J.I. (2002). Probabilistic capture zone delineation using indicator simulations. M.S. Thesis, Brigham Young University.
10. Guadagnini, A., and S. Franzetti (1999). "Time-related capture zones for contaminants in randomly heterogeneous formations." Ground Water, 37(2), 253-260.
11. Leeuwen, M. Van, A. P. Butler, J. A. Tompkins, and C. B. M. Te Stroet, (2000). "Stochastic well capture zones in fully, leaky, and randomly confined, heterogeneous aquifers." IAHS Publication, n265, ModelCARE'99, 310-316.
12. Poeter, E.P., and Hill, M.C. (1998). Documentation of UCODE, A computer code for universal inverse modeling. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4080, 116 p.
13. US Army, Groundwater Modeling Technical Support Center. (2001) Development of Groundwater and Surface Water Models for the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant, Texas. ERDC-WES.
14. Varlejn, M. D., and J. M. Shafer. (1991), "Assessment of uncertainty in time-related capture zones using conditional simulation of hydraulic conductivity." Ground Water, 29(5), 737-748.
15. Vassolo, S., W. Kinzelbach, and W. Schafer. (1998). "Determination of a well head protection zone by stochastic inverse modeling." Journal of Hydrology, 206, 268-280.
16. Walker, J. (2002). Application of Transition Probability Geostatistics for Indicator Simulations Involving the MODFLOW Model. M.S. Thesis, Brigham Young University.