On the side-effects of code abstraction

Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES)

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 244-253

  De Sutter, Bjorn ^a   De Bus, Bruno ^a   Vandierendonck, Hans ^a   De Bosschere, Koen ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Code abstraction; Code compaction; Performance

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA COMPRESSION; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS;

CODE ABSTRACTION; CODE COMPACTION TECHNIQUES;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 0242443853     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. Ayers, R. Schooler, and R. Gottlieb. Aggressive inlining. In Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 134-145, 1997.
2. B. S. Baker and U. Manber. Deducing similarities in Java sources from bytecodes. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 179-190, June 1998.
3. J. P. Bradford and R. Quong. An empirical study on how program layout affects cache miss rates. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 27(3):28-42, 1999.
4. D. Burger, T. M. Austin, and S. Bennett. Evaluating future microprocessors: The SimpleScalar tool set. Technical report, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 1996.
5. W.-K. Chen, R. Gupta, and B. Li. Code compaction of matching single-entry multiple-exit regions. In Proceedings of the the 10th Annual International Static Analysis Symposium, June 2003. To appear.
6. L. Clausen, U. Schultz, C. Consel, and G. Muller. Java bytecode compression for low-end embedded systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 22(3):471-489, 2000.
7. K. Cooper and N. McIntosh. Enhanced code compression for embedded RISC processors. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 139-149, 1999.
8. K. D. Cooper, M. W. Hall, and L. Torczon. Unexpected side effects of inline substitution: a case study. ACM Letters on Programming Languages and Systems (LOPLAS), 1(1):22-32, 1992.
9. B. De Sutter, B. De Bus, and K. De Bosschere. Sifting out the mud: Low level c++ code reuse. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), pages 275-291, 2002.
10. B. De Sutter, B. De Bus, K. De Bosschere, and S. Debray. Combining global code and data compaction. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on languages, compilers and tools for embedded systems (LCTES), pages 29-38, 2001.
11. S. Debray, W. Evans, R. Muth, and B. De Sutter. Compiler techniques for code compaction. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 22(2):378-415, 2000.
12. W. Evans and C. Fraser. Bytecode compression via profiled grammar rewriting. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 148-155, 2001.
13. C. Fraser, E. Myers, and A. Wendt. Analyzing and compressing assembly code. In Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on Compiler Construction, pages 117-121, 1984.
14. C. Fraser and T. Proebsting. Custom instruction sets for code compression. http://research.microsoft.com/∼toddpro, 1995.
15. O. Kaser and C. Ramakrishnan. Evaluating inlining techniques. Computer Languages, 24:55-72, 1998.
16. R. Komondoor and S. Horwitz. Using slicing to identify duplication in source code. In Proceedings of the 8th Static Analysis Symposium (SAS), 2001.
17. J. Krinke. Identifying similar code with program dependence graphs. In Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 301-309, 2001.
18. R. Leupers and P. Marwedel. Function inlining under code size constraints for embedded processors. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-aided Design, pages 253-256, 1999.
19. K. Pettis and R. Hansen. Profile-guided code positioning. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 16-27, 1995.
20. http://www.spec.org.