Coevolution in natural pathosystems: Effects of dominance on host-pathogen interactions

Phytopathology

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 633-639

  Ye, Terrance Z ^a   Yang, Rong Cai ^a,b   Yeh, Francis C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

Author keywords

Balancing selection; Heterozygous effect; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242417111     PISSN: 0031949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.5.633     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bergelson, J., Dwyer, G., and Emerson, J. J. 2001. Models and data on plant-enemy coevolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:469-499.
2. Fleming, R. A. 1980. Selection pressures and plant pathogens: Robustness of the model. Phytopathology 70:175-178.
3. Flor, H. H. 1956. The complementary genic systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8:29-54.
4. Frank, S. A. 1993. Coevolutionary genetics of plants and pathogens. Evol. Ecol. 7:45-75.
5. Gillespie, J. H. 1998. Population Genetics: A Concise Guide. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
6. Jayakar, S. C. 1970. A mathematical model for interaction of gene frequencies in a parasite and its host. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1:140-164.
7. Kirby, G. C., and Burdon, J. J. 1997. Effects of mutation and random drift on Leonard's gene-for-gene coevolution model. Phytopathology 87:488-493.
8. Leonard, K. J. 1977. Selection pressures and plant pathogens. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 287:207-222.
9. Leonard, K. J. 1994. Stability of equilibria in a gene-for-gene coevolution model of host-parasite interactions. Phytopathology 84:70-77.
10. Leonard, K. J., and Czochor, R. J. 1980. Theory of genetic interactions among populations of plants and their pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 18:237-258.
11. Levin, S. A. 1983. Some approaches to the modeling of coevolutionary interactions. Pages 21-65 in: Coevolution. M. Nitecki, ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Lewis, J. W. 1981. On the coevolution of pathogen and host: I. General theory of discrete time coevolution. J. Theor. Biol. 93:927-951.
13. Mode, C. J. 1958. A mathematical model for the co-evolution of obligate parasites and their hosts. Evolution 12:158-165.
14. Sedcole, J. R. 1978. Selection pressures and plant pathogens: Stability of equilibria. Phytopathology 68:967-970.
15. Strauss, S. Y. 1994. Levels of herbivory and parasitism in host hybrid zone. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:209-214.
16. Sun, P., and Yang, X. B. 1998. Stability of a gene-for-gene coevolution system under constant perturbations. Phytopathology 88:592-597.
17. Sun, P., and Yang, X. B. 1999. Two properties of a gene-for-gene coevolution system under human perturbations. Phytopathology 89:812-816.
18. Thompson, J. N., and Burdon, J. J. 1992. Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature 360:121-125.
19. Whitham, T. G., Martinsen, G. D., Floate, K. D., Dungey, H. S., Potts, B. M., and Keim, P. 1999. Plant hybrid zones affect biodiversity: Tools for a genetic-based understanding of community structure. Ecology 80:416-428.
20. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
21. Yang, R.-C., Ye, Z., and Hiratsuka, Y. 1999. Susceptibility of Pinus contorta-banksiana complex to Endocronarium harknessii: Host-pathogen interactions. Can. J. Bot. 77:1035-1043.