Automatic performance analysis of hybrid MPI/OpenMP applications

Journal of Systems Architecture

Volumn 49, Issue 10-11, 2003, Pages 421-439

  Wolf, Felix ^a   Mohr, Bernd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event tracing; Parallel computing; Performance analysis; User interface

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; MULTIPROCESSING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TREES (MATHEMATICS); USER INTERFACES;

EVENT TRACING;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 0242410899     PISSN: 13837621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-7621(03)00102-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. J. Hoeflinger, B. Kuhn, W. Nagel, P. Petersen, H. Rajic, S. Shah, J. Vetter, M. Voss, R. Woo, An integrated performance visualizer for MPI/OpenMP programs, in: Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on OpenMP (EWOMP 2001), Barcelona, Spain, 2001.
2. F. Wolf, B. Mohr, Automatic performance analysis of hybrid MPI/OpenMP applications, in: Proceedings of the 11th Euromicro Conference on Parallel Distributed and Network based Processing (PDP 2003), Genua, Italy, 2003.
3. Forschungszentrum Jülich, KOJAK, Kit for objective judgement and knowledge-based detection of performance bottlenecks. Available from 〈 http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/kojak/ 〉.
4. IST Working Group APART, Automatic performance analysis: real tools. Available from 〈 http://www.fz-juelich.de/apart/ 〉.
5. Message Passing Interface Forum, MPI: a message passing interface standard, June 1995. Available from 〈 http://www.mpi-forum.org 〉.
6. OpenMP Architecture Review Board, OpenMP Fortran Application Program Interface - Version 2.0, November 2000. Available from 〈 http://www.openmp.org 〉.
7. Miller B.P., Callaghan M.D., Cargille J.M., Hollingsworth J.K., Irvine R.B., Karavanic K.L., Kunchithapadam K., Newhall T. The Paradyn parallel performance measurement tool. IEEE Computer. 28(11):1995;37-46.
8. Cain H.W., Miller B.P., Wylie B.J.N. A callgraph-based search strategy for automated performance diagnosis. Proceedings of the 6th International Euro-Par Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 1999:2000;Springer, Munich, Germany.
9. F. Wolf, Automatic performance analysis on parallel computers with SMP nodes, Ph.D. Thesis, RWTH Aachen, Forschungszentrum Jülich, ISBN 3-00-010003-2, February 2003.
10. J.K. Hollingsworth, B.P. Miller, M.J.R. Gonçalves, O. Naim, Z. Xu, L. Zheng, MDL: a language and compiler for dynamic program instrumentation, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, San Francisco, California, 1997.
11. A. Espinosa. Automatic performance analysis of parallel programs, Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, September 2000.
12. J. Vetter. Performance analysis of distributed applications using automatic classification of communication inefficencies, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Supercomputing, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2000, pp. 245-254.
13. T. Fahringer, C. Seragiotto Júnior, Modeling and detecting performance problems for distributed and parallel programs with JavaPSL, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Supercomputers (SC2001), Denver, Colorado, 2001.
14. Cray Research, Inc, Introducing the MPP Apprentice Tool, Cray Manual IN-2511, 1994.
15. A. Arnold, U. Detert, W.E. Nagel, Performance optimization of parallel programs: tracing, zooming, understanding, in: R. Winget, K. Winget (Eds.), Proceedings of Cray User Group Meeting, Denver, CO, 1995, pp. 252-258.
16. IBM Corporation, IBM AIX Parallel Environment: Operation and Use, IBM Corporation publication SH26-7231, 1996.
17. M.T. Heath, Performance visualization with paragraph, in: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Environments and Tools for Parallel Scientific Computing, Philadelphia, 1994, pp. 221-230.
18. Shaffer E., Whitmore S., Schaeffer B., Reed D.A. Virtue: immersive performance visualization of parallel and distributed applications. IEEE Computer. 1999;44-51.
19. Parallel Tools Consortium, xlcb Graphical Browser: User Manual. Available from 〈 http://cs.oregonstate.edu/̃pancake/ptools/lcb/xlcb.html 〉.
20. Mohr B., Malony A., Shende S., Wolf F. Design and prototype of a performance tool interface for OpenMP. The Journal of Supercomputing. 23:2002;105-128.
21. S. Shende, A.D. Malony, J. Cuny, K. Lindlan. P. Beckman, S. Karmesin, Portable profiling and tracing for parallel scientific applications using C++, in: Proceedings of the SIGMETRICS Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Tools, ACM, 1998, pp. 134-145.
22. K.A. Lindlan, J. Cuny. A.D. Malony, B. Mohr, R. Rivenburgh, C. Rasmussen, A tool framework for static and dynamic analysis of object-oriented software with templates, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Supercomputers (SC2000), Dallas, Texas, 2000.
23. F. Wolf, EARL - Eine programmierbare Umgebung zur Bewertung paralleler Prozesse auf Message-Passing-Systemen, Diplomarbeit, RWTH Aachen, Forschugszentrum Jülich, Jül-Bericht 3551, June 1998.
24. The Portland Group Compiler Technology, Product Documentation. Available from 〈 http://www.pgroup.com/doc/index.htm 〉.
25. Hitachi, Hitachi SR 8000 Compiler, Technical Manual
26. F. Wolf, B. Mohr, Specifying performance properties of parallel applications using compound events, Parallel and Distributed Computing Practices, Monitoring Systems and Tool Interoperability 4 (3) (2001) (special issue).
27. T. Fahringer. M. Gerndt, B. Mohr, G. Riley, J.L. Träff, F. Wolf, Knowledge specification for automatic performance analysis, Tech. Rep. FZJ-ZAM-IB-2001-08, ESPRIT IV Working Group APART, Forschungszentrurn Jülich, revised version, August 2001.
28. Beazley D.M. Python Essential Reference. second ed. 2001;New Riders.
29. J.K. Hollingsworth, M. Steele, Grindstone: a test suite for parallel performance tools, Computer Science Technical Report CS-TR-3703, University of Maryland, October 1996.
30. F. Wolf, B. Mohr, Automatic performance analysis of MPI applications based on event traces, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Parallel Computing (Euro-Par), Munich, Germany, 2000, pp. 123-132.
31. Forschungszentrum Jülich, ZAMpano (ZAM Parallel Nodes). Available from 〈 http://zampano.zam.kfa-juelich.de/ 〉.
32. T. Diehl, V. Gülzow, Performance of the parallelized regional climate model REMO, in: Proceedings of the Eighth ECMWF Workshop on the Use of Parallel Processors in Meterology, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK, 1998, pp. 181-191.
33. Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative (ASCI), The ASCI sweep3d Benchmark Code. Available from 〈 http://www.llnl.gov/asci_benchmarks/ 〉.
34. M. Mihelcic, H. Wenzl, H. Wingerath, Flow in Czochralski crystal growth melts, Tech. Rep. Jül-2697, Forschungszentrum Jülich, December 1992.
35. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Soil-Aquifer Systems. Available from 〈 http://www.kfa-juelich.de/icg/icg4/Groups/Pollutgeosys/trace_e.html 〉.