Integrating Digital Tools into a Culturally Diverse Curriculum: An Assessment Model for the Pacesetter Program

Teachers College Record

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 278-296

  Hill, Clifford ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242409097     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9620.00240     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Hofstetter, C. (1998). Impact of selected background variables on students' NAEP math performance (CSE Technical Report 478). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Plummer, J. (1995). Language background as a variable in NAEP mathematics performance: NAEP TRP Task 3D: Language background study. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
3. Bhopal, R., & Donaldson, L. (1998). White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health. American Journal of Public Health, 88 (9), 1303-1306.
4. Bloom, B. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
5. Bowen, W., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Carnevale, A., & Fry, R. (2000). Crossing the great divide: Can we achieve equity when generation Y goes to college? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7. College Board. (2001). Pacesetter English: Voices of modern cultures. New York: Author.
8. Fleming, J., & Garcia, N. (1998). Are standardized tests fair to African Americans, Predictive validity of the SAT in black and white institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 472-495.
9. Gándara, P., & Maxwell-Jolly, J. (1998). Priming the pump: A review of programs that aim to increase the achievement of underrepresented minority undergraduates. New York: College Board.
10. Gordon, E. (1999). Education and justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (Eds.), (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Hill, C. (1992). Testing and assessment: An ecological approach (Inaugural Lecture for the Arthur I. Gates Chair in Language and Education) New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
13. Hill, C. (1995). Testing and assessment: An applied linguistics perspective. Educational Assessment, 2, 179-212.
14. Hill, C. (1999a). A national reading test for fourth graders: A missing component in the policy debate. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence I (pp. 129-152). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Publishing.
15. Hill, C. (1999b). Constructivist assessment in early childhood education. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence II (pp. 211-230). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.
16. Hill, C. (2001). Linguistic and cultural diversity: A growing challenge to American higher education. New York: College Board.
17. Hill, C., & Larsen, E. (2000). Children and reading tests. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
18. Hill, C., & Parry, K. (1994). From testing to assessment: English as an international language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
19. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.), (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
20. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
21. Ramist, L., Lewis, C., & McCamley-Jenkins, L. (1994). Student group differences in predicting college grades: Sex, language, and ethnic groups (College Board Report 93-1). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.