Localization of auditory N1 in children using MEG: Source modeling issues

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 27-35

  Pang, Elizabeth W ^a   Gaetz, William ^a,b   Otsubo, Hiroshi ^a   Chuang, Sylvester ^a   Cheyne, Douglas ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked fields (AEF); Children; Equivalent current dipole (ECD); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Source modeling

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOSENSOR; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODEL; MONAURAL HEARING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TONOTOPY;

EID: 0242391166     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00150-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Alho K., Tervaniemi M., Huotilainen M., Lavikainen J., Tiitinen H., Ilmoniemi R.J., et al. Processing of complex sounds in the human auditory cortex as revealed by magnetic brain responses. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;369-375.
2. Bruneau N., Roux S., Guérin P., Barthélémy C., Lelord G. Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4-8-year-old children. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;32-38.
3. Crouzeix A., Yvert B., Bertrand O., Pernier J. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;2176-2188.
4. Farrell D.E., Tripp J.H., Norgren R., Teyler T.J. A study of the auditory evoked magnetic field of the human brain. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 49:1980;31-37.
5. Fujiki N., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: a new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J. Neurosci. 22:(RC205):2002;1-4.
6. Nakasato N., Fujita S., Seki K., Kawamura T., Matani A., Tamura I., et al. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94:1995;183-190.
7. Näätänen R., Picton T.W. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 24:1987;375-425.
8. Ohtomo S., Nakasato N., Kanno A., Hatanaka K., Shirane R., Mizoi K., et al. Hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory evoked N100m response in relation to the crossing point between the central sulcus and Sylvian fissure. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108:1998;219-225.
9. Paetau R., Ahonen A., Salonen O., Sams M. Auditory evoked magnetic fields to tones and pseudowords in healthy children and adults. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 12:(2):1995;177-185.
10. Pang E.W., Taylor M.J. Tracking the development of the N1 from age three to adulthood: A comparison between speech and non-speech stimuli. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:2000;388-397.
11. Pantev C., Lütkenhöner B. Magnetoencephalographic studies of functional organization and plasticity of the human auditory cortex. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 17:(2):2000;130-142.
12. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lütkenhöner B., Anogianakis G., Wittkowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:1988;160-170.
13. Pantev C., Elbert T., Makeig S., Hampson S., Eulitz C., Hoke M. Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked field. Electrophenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88:1993;389-396.
14. Pantev C., Bertand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., Schuierer G., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94:1995;26-40.
15. Papanicolaou A.C., Baumann S., Rogers R.L., Saydjari C., Amparo E.G., Eisenberg H.M. Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Neurol. 47:1990;33-37.
16. Pekkonen E., Huotilainen M., Virtanen J., Sinkkonen J., Rinne T., Ilmoniemi R.J., et al. Age-related functional differences between auditory cortices: a whole-head MEG study. NeuroReport. 6:(13):1995;1803-1806.
17. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:2000;220-236.
18. Ponton C., Eggermont J.J., Khosla D., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113:2002;407-420.
19. Reite M., Edrich J., Zimmerman J.T., Zimmerman J.E. Human magnetic auditory evoked fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;114-117.
20. Rogers R.L., Papanicolaou A.C., Baumann S.B., Saydjari C., Eisenberg H.M. Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 77:1990;237-240.
21. Scherg M., von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65:1986;344-360.
22. Takeshita K., Nagamine T., Thuy D.H.D., Satow T., Matsuhashi M., Yamamoto J., et al. Maturational change of parallel auditory processing in school-aged children revealed by simultaneous recording of magnetic and electric cortical responses. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113:2002;1470-1484.
23. Virtanen J., Ahveninen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R., Pekkonen E. Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108:1998;291-298.
24. Vrba, J., Cheung, T., Cheyne, D., Robinson, S.E., Starr, A. 1998. Errors in ECD localization with partial sensor coverage. Proceedings from Biomag98, The 11th International Conference on Biomagnetism, Sendai, Japan, pp. 1-4.