Multi-objective optimization of an industrial fluidized-bed catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) using genetic algorithm (GA) with the jumping genes operator

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1785-1800

  Kasat, Rahul B ^a   Gupta, Santosh K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

FCC units; Fluidized bed catalytic crackers; Genetic algorithm; Jumping genes; Multi objective function optimization; Pareto sets; Transposons

Indexed keywords

BINARY CODES; CATALYTIC CRACKING; FLUIDIZED BEDS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEM; FLUIDIZED BED; GENETIC ALGORITHM; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CODING; FLUIDIZED BED; FLUIDIZED BED CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GLOBAL OPTIMAL PARETO SET; JUMPING GENE OPERATOR; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MUTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPOSON;

EID: 0242390999     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00153-4     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ancheyta, J. J., Lopez, I. F., & Aguilar, R. E. (1999). 5-lump kinetic model for gas oil catalytic cracking. Applied Catalysis A 177, 227.
2. Arandes, J. M., Azkoiti, M. J., Bilbao, J., & de Lasa, H. I. (2000). Modeling FCC units under steady and unsteady state conditions. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 78, 111.
3. Arbel, A., Huang, Z., Rinard, I. H., Shinnar, R., & Sapre, A. V. (1995). Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 1. Modeling of the current generation of FCC's. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 34, 1228.
4. Avidan, A. A., & Shinnar, R. (1990). Development of catalytic cracking technology. A lesson in chemical reactor design. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 29, 931.
5. Bhaskar, V., Gupta, S. K., & Ray, A. K. (2000). Applications of multiobjective optimization in chemical engineering. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 16, 1.
6. Carlos, A. C. C., van Veldhuizen, D. A., & Lamont, G. B. (2002). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. New York: Kluwer Academic.
7. Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. V. (1983). Multiobjective decision making-Theory and methodology. New York: Elsevier.
8. Chitnis, U. K., & Corripio, A. B. (1998). On-line optimization of a model IV fluid catalytic cracking unit. ISA Trans. 37, 215.
9. Dave, D., & Saraf, D. N. (2003). A model suitable for rating and optimization of industrial FCC units. Indian Chemical Engineer 45, 7.
10. Davis, T. A., Griffin, D. E., & Webb, P. U. (1974). Cat cracker optimization and control. Chemical Engineering Progress 70, 53.
11. De Lasa, H. I., Errazu, A., Barreiro, E., & Solioz, S. (1981). Analysis of fluidized bed catalytic cracking regenerator models in an industrial scale unit. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59, 549.
12. Deb, K. (1995). Optimization for engineering design: algorithms and examples. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
13. Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182.
15. Edgar, T. F., Himmelblau, D. M., & Lasdon, L. S. (2001). Optimization of Chemical Processes (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Edwards, W. M., & Kim, H. N. (1988). Multiple steady states in FCC unit operations. Chemical Engineering Science 43, 1825.
17. Ellis, R. C., Li, X., & Riggs, J. B. (1998). Modeling and optimization of a model IV fluidized catalytic cracking unit. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal 44, 2068.
18. Elnashaie, S., & Yates, J. G. (1973). Multiplicity of the steady state in fluidised bed reactors-I. Steady state considerations. Chemical Engineering Science 28, 515.
19. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H., & El-Hennawi, I. M. (1979). Multiplicity of the steady state in fluidized reactors-IV. Fluid catalytic cracker (FCC). Chemical Engineering Science 34, 1113.
20. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H., & Elbialy, S. H. (1980). Multiplicity of steady states in fluidized bed reactors-V. The effect of catalyst decay. Chemical Engineering Science 35, 1357.
21. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H., & Elshishini, S. S. (1993). Digital simulation of industrial fluid catalytic cracking units-IV. Static and dynamic bifurcation. Chemical Engineering Science 48, 567.
22. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H., Abasaeed, A. E., & Elshishini, S. S. (1995). Digital simulation of industrial fluid catalytic cracking units-V. Static and dynamic bifurcation. Chemical Engineering Science 50, 1635.
23. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H., Abashar, M. E., & Teymour, F. A. (1995). Chaotic behaviour of fluidized-bed catalytic reactors with consecutive endothermic chemical reactions. Chemical Engineering Science 50, 49.
24. Elshishini, S. S., & Elnashaie, S. S. E. H. (1990). Digital simulation of industrial fluid catalytic cracking units: bifurcation and its implications. Chemical Engineering Science 45, 553.
25. Errazu, A. F., de-Lasa, H. I., & Sarti, F. A, (1979). A fluidized bed catalytic cracking regenerator model. Grid effects. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 57, 191.
26. Fogel, D. B. (1995). A comparison of evolutionary programming and genetic algorithms on selected constrained optimization problems. Simulation 64, 397.
27. Fonseca, C.M., & Fleming, P.J., Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, (1993). pp. 416-423.
28. Hajela, P., Lee E., & Lin, C,Y., Genetic algorithms in structural topology optimization. In Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Topology Design of Structures, Sesimbra, Portugal, (1992). pp. 117-134.
29. Han, I., Chung, C., & Riggs, J. B. (2000). Modeling of a fluidized catalytic cracking process. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24, 1681.
30. Horn, J., & Nafploitis, N., Multiobjective optimization using the niched Pareto genetic algorithm. Technical Report 93005, IlliGAL, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. (1993).
31. Iscol, L., The dynamics and stability of a fluid catalytic cracker. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Atlanta; (1970). Paper 23B.
32. Jacob, S. M., Gross, B., Voltz, S. E., & Weekman, V. W., Jr. (1976). A lumping and reaction scheme for catalytic cracking. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal 22, 701.
33. Kasat, R., Kunzru, D., Saraf, D. N., & Gupta, S. K. (2002). Multiobjective optimization of industrial FCC units using elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 41, 4765.
34. Khandalekar, P. D., & Riggs, J. B. (1995). Nonlinear process model based control and optimization of a model IV FCC unit. Computers and Chemical Engineering 19, 1153.
35. Kita, H., Yabumoto, Y., Mori, N., & Nishikawa, Y., Multi-objective optimization by means of thermodynamical genetic algorithm. In Processing of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature IV (PPSN-IV), Berlin, (1996). pp. 504-512.
36. Knowles, J. D., & Corne, D. W. (2000). Approximating the non-dominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evolutionary Computation 8, 149.
37. Krishna, A. S., & Parkin, E. S. (1985). Modeling the regenerator in commercial fluid catalytic cracking units. Chemical Engineering Progress 81, 57.
38. Kunii, D., & Levenspiel, O. (1969). Fluidization Engineering. New York: Wiley.
39. Kursawe, F., A Variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, I (PPSN-I), Dortmund, Germany, (1990), pp. 193-197.
40. McFarlane, R. C., & Bacon, D. W. (1989). Adaptive optimizing control of multivariable constrained chemical processes. 1. Theoretical development. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 28, 1828.
41. McKlintock, B., The discovery and characterization of transposable elements, In The Collected Papers of Barbara McClintock, New York: Garland, (1987).
42. Murata, T., Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization. Ph.D. Thesis, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan, (1997).
43. Nandasana, A., Ray, A.K., & Gupta, S.K., Dynamic simulation of industrial steam reactors: an improved model. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 00, 0000, (2003).
44. Osyczka, A., & Kundu, S. (1995). A new method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problems using the simple genetic algorithm. Structural Optimization 10, 94.
45. Ramasubramanian, S., Luus, R., & Woo, S.S., Optimization of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit. 50th Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, (2000).
46. Rhemann, H., Schwarz, G., Badgwell, T.A., Darby, M.L., & White, D.C., On-line FCCU advanced control and optimization. Hydrocarbon Processing, June, 64 (1989).
47. Rudolph, G., Evolutionary search under partially ordered fitness sets. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Science Innovations in Engineering of Natural and Artificial Intelligent Systems (ISI 2001), Dubai, UAE, (2001). pp. 818-822.
48. Schaffer, J.D., Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, (1984).
49. Srinivas, N., & Deb, K. (1994). Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 2, 221.
50. Stryer, L. (2000). Biochemistry (4th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
51. van Veldhuizen, D., Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses and new innovation. Ph.D. Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, (1999).
52. Webb, P. U., Lutter, B. E., & Hair, R. L. (1978). Dynamic optimization of fluid cat crackers. Chemical Engineering Progress 74, 72.
53. Weekman, V. W., Jr. (1969). Kinetics and dynamics of catalytic cracking selectivity in fixed bed reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Development 8, 385.
54. Zhao, W., Chen, D., & Hu, S. (2000). Optimizing operating conditions based on ANN and modified GAs. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24, 61.
55. Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L., An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: The strength Pareto approach. Technical Report 43, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, (1998).
56. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation 8, 173.