Verb raising in American sign language

Lingua

Volumn 103, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 127-149

  Matsuoka, Kazumi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242370878     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(97)00015-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aarons, D., B. Bahan, J. Kegl and C. Neidle, 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15, 103-142.
2. Branigan, P., 1992. Subjects and complementizers. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
3. Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
4. Fischer, S., 1987. The head parameter in ASL. In: W. Edmondson, F. Karlsson (eds.), SLR'87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 75-85.
5. Fischer, S. and W. Janis, 1992. License to derive: Resolving conflicts between syntax and morphology in ASL. Ms.
6. Kayne, R., 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Klima, E. and U. Bellugi, 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Koopman, H., 1984. The syntax of verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche, 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85, 211-258.
10. Kuroda, S-Y., 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Synta x, CSLI, Stanford, 103-143.
11. Lasnik, H., 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. In: N. Hornstein, D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanations in linguistics, 152-173. London: Longmans. [Reprinted in Lasnik, 1990.]
12. Lasnik, H., 1990. Essays on restrictiveness and learnability. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Lasnik, H., 1995a. Case and expletives revisited: On greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 615-633.
14. Lasnik, H., 1995b. Last resort. In: S. Haraguchi, M. Funaki (eds.), Minimalism and linguistic theory, 1-32. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
15. Lasnik, H., 1995c. Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In: P. Kempchinsky, H. Campos (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Liddell, S., 1980. American Sign Language syntax. Mouton: The Hague.
17. Lillo-Martin, D., 1986. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 415-444.
18. Lillo-Martin, D., 1990. Parameters for questions: Evidence from wh-movement in ASL. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 211-222. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
19. Matsuoka, K., 1996a. Verb raising in American Sign Language: A theoretical approach. Paper presented at 1996 Annual Meeting, Linguistic Society of America, San Diego.
20. Matsuoka, K., 1996b. On the lexical verb sandwich. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
21. Padden, C., 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series. New York: Garland.
22. Petronio, K., 1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
23. Petronio, K. and D. Lillo-Martin, 1997. WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73, 18-57.
24. Pollok, J-Y., 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 425-456.
25. Romano, C., 1991. Mixed headedness in American Sign Language: Evidence from functional categories. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 241-254.