Allogeneic interactions in Hydractinia: Is the transitory chimera beneficial?

International Journal of Developmental Biology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 433-438

  Gild, Sharon ^a   Frank, Uri ^b   Mokady, Ofer ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fusion; Germ line parasitism; Invertebrate allorecognition; Rejection; Transitory fusion

Indexed keywords

ALLOGENEIC RESTRICTION; ALLOIMMUNITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHIMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUSION; GRAFT REJECTION; GROWTH RATE; IMMUNE SYSTEM; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; CHIMERA; HYDROZOA;

ANIMALIA; HYDRACTINIA; HYDROIDA; INVERTEBRATA; PROTOZOA;

EID: 0242362274     PISSN: 02146282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BLACKSTONE, N.W. and YUND, P.O. (1989). Morphological variation in a colonial marine hydroid: a comparison of size-based heterochrony. Paleobiology 15: 1-10.
2. BUSS, L.W. (1982). Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79: 5337-5341.
3. BUSS, L.W. (1990). Competition within and between encrusting clonal invertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 352-356.
4. BUSS, L.W. and BLACKSTONE, N.W. (1991). An experimental exploration of Waddington's epigenetic landscape. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 332: 49-58.
5. BUSS, L.W. and GREEN, D.R. (1985). Histoincompatibility in vertebrates: the relict hypothesis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 9: 191-201.
6. BUSS, L.W. and GROSBERG, R.K., (1990). Morphogenic basis for phenotypic differences in hydroid competitive behavior. Nature 343: 63-66.
7. BUSS, L.W., MCFADDEN, C.S. and KEENE, D.R. (1984). Biology of hydractiniid hydroids. 2. Histocompatibility effector system/competitive mechanism mediated by nematocyst discharge. Biol. Bull. 167: 139-158.
8. BUSS, L.W. and SHENK, A.M. (1990). Hydroid allorecognition regulates competition at both the level of the colony and at the level of the cell lineage. In: Marchalonis, J.J. and Reinish, C. (Ed.). Defense Molecules. A.R. Liss Press, New York, pp. 85-106.
9. th Int. Workshop on Hydroid Development. Tutzing: p. 115.
10. CHADWICK-FURMAN, N. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (1995). Life history plasticity in chimeras of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 262: 157-162.
11. CRAMPTON, W.G.R. and HURST, L.D. (1994). True kin recognition in the form of somatic incompatibility has multiple independent origins. Anim. Behav. 47: 230-234.
12. FELDGARDEN, M. and YUND, P.O. (1992). Allorecognition in colonial marine invertebrates: does selection favor fusion with kin or fusion with self? Biol. Bull. 182: 155-158.
13. FRANK, U., OREN, U., LOYA, Y. and RINKEVICH, B. (1997). Alloimmune maturation in the coral Stylophora pistillata is achieved through three distinctive stages, 4 months post metamorphosis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264: 99-104.
14. GROSBERG, R.K. (1988). The evolution of allorecognition specificity. Quant. Rev. Biol. 63: 377-412.
15. GROSBERG, R.K. (2000). Mate selection and the evolution of highly polymorphic self/nonself recognition genes. Science 289: 2111-2114.
16. GROSBERG, R.K. and QUINN, J.F. (1988). The evolution of allrecognition specificity. In: Grosberg, R.K., Hedgecock, D. and Nelson, K. (Ed.). Invertabrate Historecognition. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 157-167.
17. GROSBERG, R.K. and QUINN, J.F. (1986). The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by the larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature 322: 456-459.
18. GROSBERG, R.K. and STRATHMANN, R.R. (1998). One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: the persistence of a unicellular stage in multicelluar life histories. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 112-116.
19. HART, M.W. and GROSBERG, R.K. (1999). Kin interactions in a colonial hydrozoan (Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus): population structure on a mobile landscape. Evolution 53: 793-805.
20. HARVELL, C.D. and GROSBERG, R.K. (1988). The timing of sexual maturation in clonal animals. Ecology 69: 1885-1864.
21. HAUENSCHILD, V.C. (1954). Genetische und entwicklungsphysiologische Untersuchungen über Intersexualität und Gewebeverträglichkeit bei Hydractionia echinata Flem. (Hydroz. Bougainvill.) Roux Arch. Entwicklugsmech. 147: 1-41.
22. HUMPHREYS, T. and REINHERZ, E.L (1994). Invertebrate immune recognition, natural immunity and the evolution of positive selection. Immunol. Today 15: 316-320.
23. ILAN, M. and LOYA, Y. (1990). Ontogenetic variation in sponge histocompatibility responses. Biol. Bull. 179: 279-286.
24. IVKER, F.B. (1972). A hierarchy of histo-incompatibility in Hydractinia echinata. Biol. Bull. 143: 162-174.
25. LAIRD, D.J., DE TOMASO, A.W., COOPER, M.D. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (2000). 50 million years of chordate evolution: seeking the origins of adaptive immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 6924-6926.
26. LANGE, R.G., DICK, M.H. and MÜLLER, W.A. (1992). Specificity and early ontogeny of historecognition in the hydroid Hydractinia. J. Exp. Zool. 262: 307-316.
27. LANGE, R.G., PLICKERT, G. and MÜLLER, W.A. (1989). Histoincompatibility in a low invertebrate, Hydractinia echinata. Analysis of the mechanism of rejection. J. Exp. Zool. 249: 284-292.
28. MANLY, B.F.J. (1997). RT - A program for randomization testing. Version 2.1. CASM, pp. 1-15. University of Otago, New Zeland.
29. MOKADY, O. and BUSS, L.W. (1996). Transmission genetics of allorecognition in Hydractinia symiolongicarpus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Genetics 143: 823-828.
30. MOKADY, O. (1996). Occam's razor, invertabrate allorecognition and Ig superfamily evolution. Res. Immunol. 147: 241-246.
31. MÜLLER, W.A. (1964). Experimetelle Untersuchungen über Stockentwicklung, Polypendifferenzierung und Sexualchimären bei Hydractinia echinata. Wilhelm Roux Arch. 155: 181-268.
32. PANCER, Z., GERSHON, H. and RINKEVICH, B. (1995). Coexistence and possible parasitism of somatic and germ lines in chimeras of the colonial urochordate Botryllus schlosseri. Biol. Bull 109: 106-112.
33. RINKEVICH, B. (1998). Immonology of human implantation: from the invertebrates' point of view. Hum. Reprod. 13: 455-459.
34. RINKEVICH, B. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (1987). A long term study on fused subclones in the ascidian Botryllus Schlosseri: the resorption phenomenon (Protochordata: Tunicata). J. Zool. Lond. 213: 717-733.
35. RINKEVICH, B. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (1992). Chimeras vs genetically homogeneous individuals: potential fitness costs and benefits. Oikos. 63: 119-124.
36. SCHIJFSMA, K. (1935). Observations on Hydractinia echinata (Flem.) and Eupagurus bernhardus (L.). Arch. Neéri. Zool. 1: 261-314.
37. SHAPIRO, D.F. (1992). Intercolony coordination of zooid behavior and a new class of pore plates in a marine bryozoan. Biol. Bull. 182: 221-230.
38. SHAPIRO, D.F. (1996). Size dependent neural integration between genetically different colonies of a marine bryozoan. J. Exp. Biol 199: 1229-1239.
39. SHENK, A.M. and BUSS, L.W. (1991). Ontogenic changes in fusibility in the colonial hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. J. Exp. Zool. 257: 80-86.
40. SHENK, A.M. (1991). Allorecognition in the colonial marine hydroid Hydractinia (Cnidaria/Hydrozoa). Amer. Zool. 31: 549-557.
41. STONER, D.S., RINKEVICH, B. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (1999). Heritable germ and somatic cell lineage competition in chimeric colonial protochordates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 9148-9153.
42. STONER, D.S. and WEISSMAN, I.L. (1996). Somatic and germ cell parasitism in a colonial ascidian: Possible role for a polymorphic allorecognition system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93: 15254-15259.
43. VAN DEVYVER, G., HOLVOET, S. and DEWINT, P. (1990). Variability of the immune response in freshwater sponges. J. Exp. Zool. 254: 215-227.
44. YUND, P.O., CUNNINGHAM, C.W. and BUSS, L.W. (1987). Recruitment and postrecruitment interactions in a colonial hydroid. Ecology, 68: 971-982.