The Interplay of Speech Perception and Phonology: Experimental Evidence from Turkish

Phonetica

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 208-229

  Mielke, Jeff ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TURKEY;

EID: 0242362222     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000073503     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aslin, R.N.; Pisoni, D.B.: Some developmental processes in speech perception; in Yeni-Komshian, Kavanagh, Ferguson, Child phonology, vol. 2, Perception, pp. 67-96 (Academic Press, New York 1980).
2. Best, C.T.; McRoberts, G.W.; Sithole, N.M.: Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. J. exp. Psychol. Learning Memory Cognition 14:345-360 (1988).
3. Bladon, A: Phonetics for hearers; in McGregor, Language for hearers, pp. 1-24 (Pergamon, Oxford 1986).
4. Coble, S.F.; Robinson, D.E.: Discriminability of bursts of reproducible noise. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 2630-2635 (1992).
5. Delgutte, B.; Kiang, N.Y.S.: Speech coding in the auditory nerve: III. Voiceless fricative consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 887-896 (1984).
6. Fujimura, O.; Macchi, M.J.; Streeter, L.A.: Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: a crosslinguistic study. Lang. Speech 21: 337-346 (1978).
7. Green, D.M.; Swets, J.A.: Signal detection theory and psychophysics (Wiley, New York 1966).
8. Hume, E.; Johnson, K.: A model for the interplay of speech perception and phonology; in Hume, Johnson, The role of speech perception in phonology, pp. 3-26 (Academic Press, New York 2001).
9. Hura, S.L.; Lindblom, B.; Diehl, R.: On the role of perception in shaping phonological assimilation rules. Lang. Speech 35: 59-72 (1992).
10. Jannedy, S.: Gestural phasing as an explanation for vowel devoicing in Turkish; in Jannedy, Papers from the linguistic laboratory. OSU Working Papers Ling. 45: 56-84 (1995).
11. Kavitskaya, D.: Compensatory lengthening: phonetics, phonology, diachrony; PhD diss. University of California, Berkeley (2001).
12. Kohler, K.: Segmental reduction in connected speech: phonological facts and phonetic explanations; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 69-92 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990).
13. Kuhl,P.K.; Williams,K.A.; Lacerda,F.; Stevens,K.N.; Lindblom, B: Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255:606-608 (1992).
14. Lewis,G.L.: Turkish grammar (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1967).
15. Lindblom, B.: Economy of speech gestures; in MacNeilage, The production of speech (Springer, New York 1983).
16. Lindblom, B.: Can the models of evolutionary biology be applied to phonetic problems? in Van den Broecke, Cohen, Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., pp. 67-81 (Foris, Dordrecht 1984).
17. Lisker, L.; Abramson, A.S: A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384-22(1964).
18. MacMillan, N.A.; Creelman, D.: Responses bias: characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and 'nonparametric' indexes. Psychol. Bull. 107: 401-413 (1990).
19. MacMillan, N.A.; Creelman, D.: Detection theory: a user's guide (Cambridge, New York 1991).
20. Mielke, J.: Explaining directional asymmetry in Turkish [h] deletion: a crosslinguistic study of perceptibility; in Hume, Johnson, Studies in the interplay of speech perception and phonology. OSU Working Papers Ling. 55: 117-171 (2001).
21. Mielke, J.: Formalizing the perception-phonology interaction: looking for evidence of the P-map in speech style variation. Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto Phonology Workshop. Montréal 2002a.
22. Mielke, J.: Interplay between perceptual salience and contrast: /h/ perceptibility in Turkish, Arabic, English, and French. 2nd Int. Conf. on Contrast in Phonol., 2002b.
23. Mielke, J.: The diachronic influence of perception: experimental evidence from Turkish. Proc. BLS 29, 2003.
24. Ohala, J.: The listeners as a source of sound change: in Masek, Hendrik, Miller, Chicago Linguistics Society, CLS 17, pp. 178-203 (Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago 1981).
25. Ohala, J.: Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. Chicago Linguistics Society: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable. CLS 28, pp. 319-338 (Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago 1992).
26. Ohala, J.: The perceptual basis of some sound patterns; in Connell, Arvaniti, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. IV: Phonology and phonetic evidence, pp. 87-94 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993).
27. Ovcharova, O. A perception-based study of consonant deletion in Turkish. Poster, ICPhS satellite meeting The Role of Speech Perception Phenomena in Phonology, 1999.
28. Pickles, J.O.: An introduction to the physiology of hearing (Academic Press, San Diego 1988).
29. Sezer, E.: An autosegmental analysis of compensatory lengthening in Turkish: in Wetzels, Sezer, Studies in compensatory lengthening (Foris. Dordrecht 1986).
30. Steriade, D.: Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA (unpublished, 1997).
31. Steriade, D.: Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account: in Hume, Johnson, The role of speech perception in phonology, pp. 219-250 (Academic Press, New York 2001).
32. Steriade, D.: The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization; in Inkelas, Khanson, A festschrift for Paul Kiparsky (CLSI Publications, Stanford, in press).
33. Valdman, A.: Introduction to French phonology and morphology (Newbury House Publishers, Rowley 1976).
34. Vihman, M.M.: Phonological development: the origins of language in the child (Blackwell, Cambridge 1996).
35. Volaitis, L.E.; Miller, J.L.: Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 723-735 (1992).
36. Werker, J.F.; Logan. J.S.: Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception Psychophysics 17: 35-4 (1985).
37. Werker, J.F.; Tees, R.C.: Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav. Dev. 7: 49-63 (1984).
38. Winer, B.J.: Statistical principles in experimental design (McGraw-Hill, New York 1971).
39. Wright, R.: Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou; UCLA PhD diss. (1996).
40. Zawadowski, Y.N.: The Maghrib Arabic dialects (Central Department of Oriental Literature, Moscow 1978).
41. Zimmer, K.; Orgun, O.: Turkish; in Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999).