MRCP(UK) PART 2 Clinical Examination (PACES): A review of the first four examination sessions (June 2001 - July 2002)

Clinical Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 452-459

  Dacre, Jane ^a   Besser, Mike ^b   White, Patricia ^b  

^a WHITTINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Clinical examination; Medical education; MRCP; PACES

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPETENCE; ETHICS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SKILL; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0242352414     PISSN: 14702118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-5-452     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Examining the Royal Colleges' examiners. Lancet 1990;335:443-5.
2. London D. Game, set and MRCP, Lancet 1994;22:334:1159.
3. MRCP(UK) Policy Committee. Review of the MRCP(UK) Examination. London: Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK, 1997:23-30 (internal document).
4. Norcini JJ. The death of the long case? BMJ 2002;324:408-9.
5. Newble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers, 2nd edn. Norwell, MA: MTP Press, 1987.
6. Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK. MRCP(UK) Regulations and information for candidates, 2002 edn, London: Federation of RCPs of the UK, 2002.
7. PACES: Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills. The new MRCP(UK) Clinical Examination. JR Coll Physicians Lond 2000;34(1):57-60.
8. Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK. MRCP(UK) Part 2 Clinical Examination (PACES) and clinical guidelines (2001/2). London: Federation of RCPs of the UK, 2002.
9. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2001.
10. Stillman PL, Regan M, Philbin M, Haley H. Results of a survey on the use of standardised patients to teach and evaluate clinical skills. Acad Med 1990;65:288-92.
11. Bordage G. Key features approach to assessing clinical decision making. Toronto: College of Nurses of Ontario, 1996.