Managing R&D in technology-followers

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1095-1109

  Forbes, Naushad ^a   Wield, David ^b  

^a S   (United States)

^b Development Policy and Practice   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

LDCs; NICs; R D and design management; Technology followers

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242341023     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00071-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Chataway, J., Webster, A., Wield, D. (Eds.), 1999. Technologies in Transition. Technovation 19, 339-456.
2. Cohen W., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 99:1989;569-596.
3. Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;128-152.
4. Coombs R., Richards A. Technology, products and firm strategies: Part 1. A framework for analysis. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 3:1991;77-86.
5. Department of Science and Technology, 1992. Research and Development Statistics, 1990-1991. Government of India Publications, Delhi.
6. Department of Science and Technology, 1995. Research and Development Statistics, 1992-1993. Government of India Publications, Delhi.
7. Desai, A., 1997. Business Standard. New Delhi, 30 December.
8. Dore, R., 1984. Technological self-reliance: sturdy ideal or self-serving rhetoric. In: Fransman, M., King, K. (Eds.), pp. 65-80.
9. Dore R. Technology in a world of national frontiers. World Development. 17:1989;1665-1676.
10. Dore, R., 1990. Reflections on culture and social change. In: Gereffi, G., Wyman, D. (Eds.), pp. 353-367.
11. Edquist, C. (Ed.), 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London.
12. Faulkner W. Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: a second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology and Human Values. 19:1994;425-458.
13. Forbes, N., 1991. Should developing countries do science? Working Paper, Program in Science Technology and Society, Stanford University.
14. Forbes N. Technology and Indian industry: what is liberalization changing? Technovation. 19:1999;403-412.
15. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage, London.
16. Hewlett-Packard Singapore A, B, C, 1994. Case Study. Harvard Business School, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
17. Hobday, M., 1995. Innovation in East Asia. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
18. Hounshell, D., 1996. The evolution of industrial research in the United States. In: Rosenbloom, Spencer (Eds.), pp. 13-86.
19. Katz, J. (Ed.), 1987. Technology Generation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries. Macmillan, London.
20. Kim, L., 1997a. Imitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
21. Kim L. The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review. 39:1997;86-100.
22. Kim L. Crisis construction and organization learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai motor. Organization Science. 9:1998;506-521.
23. Klevorick A.K., Levin R.C., Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy. 24:1995;185-205.
24. Kline, S., 1989. Models of Innovation and their Policy Consequences, Report INN-4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
25. Kline, S., 1991. Government Technology Policy: What should it do? Report INN-6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
26. Lall, S., 1987. Learning to Industrialize: The Acquisition of Technological Capability by India. Macmillan, London.
27. Lall, S., 1990. Building Industrial Competitiveness in Developing Countries. OECD Development Centre, Paris.
28. Leonard-Barton, D., 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
29. Leonard-Barton, D., Doyle, J., 1996. Commercializing Technology: Imaginative Understanding of User's Needs. In: Rosenbloom, Spencer (Eds.), pp. 177-208.
30. Moore, G., 1996. Some personal perspectives on research in the semiconductor industry. In: Rosenbloom, Spencer (Eds.), pp. 165-176.
31. Nelson, R., 1987. Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
32. Nelson, R.R., 1992. The Role of firms in technical advance. In: Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technology and Enterprise. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 164-184.
33. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
34. Nelson R.R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature. 35:1995;48-90.
35. Okimoto, D., Rohlen, T. (Eds.), 1988. Inside the Japanese System. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
36. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1992. Technology and the Economy. OECD, Paris.
37. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy. 13:1984;343-374.
38. POSCO, 1994. Case Study. Stanford Business School.
39. Radosevic S. International technology transfer policy: from contract bargaining to sourcing. Technovation. 19:1999;433-444.
40. Riggs, H., 1988. Innovations: A US-Japan perspective. In: Okimoto, D., Rohlen, T. (Eds.), pp. 246-252.
41. Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money). Research Policy. 19:1990;165-174.
42. Rosenberg, N., 1996. Uncertainty and technical change. In: Landau et al. (Eds.), pp. 334-356.
43. Rosenbloom, R., Spencer, W. (Eds.), 1996. Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
44. Teece, D., 1981. The Market for know-how. In: Technology Transfer: New Issues, New Analysis, special issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 81-96.
45. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., 1997. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Organizational and Market Change. Wiley, Chichester.
46. Tushman M., Nelson R.R. Introduction: technology, organizations and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;1-8.
47. Walsh V. Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm. Research Policy. 25:1996;509-529.
48. Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M., Potter, S., 1992. Winning By Design. Blackwell, Oxford.