Geomagnetic moment instability between 0.6 and 1.3 Ma from cosmonuclide evidence

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 30, Issue 15, 2003, Pages

  Carcaillet, Julien T ^a   Thouveny, Nicolas ^a   Bourlès, Didier L ^a  

^a CEREGE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REMANENCE; SEDIMENTS; VOLCANOES; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SUBMARINE GEOLOGY;

VOLCANIC MATERIALS; AUTHIGENIC; COSMOGENIC ISOTOPES; GEOMAGNETIC EXCURSIONS; MARINE SEDIMENTARY ARCHIVES; PALEOINTENSITY;

GEOMAGNETISM;

COSMOGENIC RADIONUCLIDE; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC INTENSITY; PALEOMAGNETISM; QUATERNARY;

EID: 0242337442     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2003GL017550     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. 231Pa, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 96, 287-304, 1990.
2. 36Cl flux in the GRIP Ice core, Greenland, Science, 279, 1330-1332, 1998.
3. 9Be in marine sediments and their potential for dating, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 443-452, 1989.
4. Creer, K. M., P. W. Readman, and A. M. Jacobs, Palaeomagnetic and palaeontological dating of a section at Gioia Tauro. Italy: Identification of the Blake Event, Earth, Planet. Sci. Lett., 50, 289-300, 1980.
5. Champion, D. E., M. A. Lanphere, and M. A. Kuntz, Evidence for a New Geomagnetic Reversal From Lava Flows in Idaho: Discussion of Short Polarity Reversals in the Brunhes and Late Matuyama Polarity Chrons, J. Geophys. Res., 93(B10), 11,667-11,680, 1988.
6. Channell, J. E. T., A. Mazaud, P. Sullivan, S. Turner, and M. E. Raymo, Geomagnetic excursions and paleointensities in the Matuyama Chron at Ocean Drilling Program Sites 983 and 984 (Iceland Basin), J. Geophys. Res., 107(B6), 1.1-1.14, 2002.
7. Doell, R. R., G. B. Dalrymple, R. L. Smith, and R. A. Bailey, Paleomagnetism, potassium-Argon ages, and geology of Rhyolites and assoviated rocks of the Valles caldera, New Mexico, Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 116, 211-248, 1968.
8. Dunai, T. J., Influence of the secular variation of the geomagnetic field on the production rates of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 193, 197-212, 2001.
9. Elsasser, W., E. P. Ney, and J. R. Winckler, Cosmic-ray intensity and geomagnetism, Nature, 178, 1226-1227, 1956.
10. 10Be in globally stacked deep sea sediments, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 149, 121-129, 1997.
11. Frank, M., Comparison of cosmogenic radionuclide production and geomagnetic field intensity over the last 200,000 years, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser., 358, 1089-1107, 2000.
12. Gee, J. S., S. C. Cande, J. A. Hildebrand, K. Donnelly, and R. L. Parker, Geomagnetic intensity variations over the past 780 kyr obtained from near-seafloor magnetic anomalies, Nature, 408, 827-832, 2000.
13. Guo, B., R. Zhu, F. Florindo, Z. Ding, and J. A. Sun, A short, reverse polarity interval within the Jaramillo subchron: Evidence from the Jingbian Section, northern Chinese Loess Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B6), 101,029-101,040, 2002.
14. Guyodo, Y., C. Richter, and J.-P. Valet, Paleointensity record from Pleistocene sediments (1.4 -0 Ma) off the California Margin, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B10), 22,953-22,964, 1999.
15. Guyodo, Y., and J.-P. Valet, Global changes in intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during the past 800 kyr, Nature, 399, 249-252, 1999.
16. Hartl, P., and L. Tauxe, A precursor to the Matuyama/Brunhes transition-field instability as recorded in pelagic sediments, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 138, 121-135, 1996.
17. 9Be in South Atlantic DSDP site 519: Relation to geomagnetic reversals and to sediments composition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 98, 267-276, 1990.
18. Hilgen, F. J., Extension of the astronomically calibrated (polarity) time scale to the Miocene/Pliocene boundary, Earth, Planet. Sci. Lett., 107, 349-368, 1991.
19. Kent, D. V., and D. A. Schneider, Correlation of the paleointensity variations records in the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity transition interval, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 129, 135-144, 1995.
20. Kok, Y. S., and L. Tauxe, Saw-toothed pattern of relative paleointensity records and cumulative viscous remanence, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 137, 95-99, 1996.
21. Kok, Y. S., and L. Tauxe, A relative geomagnetic paleointensity stack from Ontong-Java Plateau sediments for the Matuyama, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B11), 25,401-25,413, 1999.
22. Lal, D., Expected secular variations in the global terrestrial production rate of radiocarbon, in The last Deglaciation: Absolute and Radiocarbon Chronologies, NATO ASI Ser. 1, Global Environ. Change, vol. 2. edited by E. Bard and W. S. Broecker, 113-126, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.
23. Mankinen, E. A., J. M. Donnelly, and C. S. Gromme, Geomagnetic polarity event recorded at 1.1 m.y. B. P. on Cobb Mountain, Clear Lake volcanic field, California, Geology, 6, 653-656, 1978.
24. Masarik, J., and J. Beer, Simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic nuclide production in the Earth's atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D10), 12,099-12,111, 1999.
25. Meynadier, L., J.-P. Valet, Y. Guyodo, and C. Richter, Saw-toothed variations of relative paleointensity and cumulative viscous remanence: Testing the records and the model, J. Geophys. Res., 103(B4), 7095-7105, 1998.
26. Pillans, B. J., P. A. Roberts, G. S. Wilson, S. T. Abbott, and B. V. Alloway, Magnetostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and tephrostratigraphic constraints on Lower and Middle Pleistocene sea-level changes, Wanganui Basin, New Zealand, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 121, 81-98, 1994.
27. Quidelleur, X., J. Carlut, P. Y. Gillot, and V. Soler, Evolution of the geomagnetic field prior to the Matuyama-Brunhes transition: Radiometric dating of a 820 ka excursion at La Palma, Geophys. J. Int., 151(2), F6-10, 2002.
28. 10Be concentration variations during a geomagnetic field reversal, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 717-719, 1979.
29. 10Be during a geomagnetic reversal, Nature, 315, 315-317, 1985.
30. 26Al with a Tandetron AMS facility. Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B29, 22-26, 1987.
31. Raisbeck, G. M., F. Yiou, D. Bourlès, E. Brown, D. Deboffle, P. Jouhanneau, J. Lestringuez, and Z. Q. Zhou, The AMS facility at Gif-sur-Yvette: Progress, perturbations and projects, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B92, 43-46, 1994.
32. 39Ar dating, Chem. Geol., 145, 117-152, 1998.
33. 10Be and geomagnetic field strength records in central North Atlantic sediments during the last 80 ka, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 136, 551-557, 1995.
34. Shackleton, N. J., A. Berger, and W. R. Peltier, An alternative astronomical calibration of the lower Pleistocene time scale based on ODP Site 677, Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh Earth Sci., 81, 251-261, 1990.
35. 39Ar timescale of reversal and events, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B1), 679-693, 1999.
36. Sun, D. H., J. Shaw, Z. S. An, and T Rolph, Matuyama/Brunhes (M/B) transition recorded in Chinese Loess, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 45, 319-330, 1993.
37. Tauxe, L., Sedimentary records of relative paleointensity of the geomagnetic field: Theory and pratice, Rev. of Geophys., 31(3), 319-354, 1993.
38. Valet, J. P., and L. Meynadier, Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the past four million years, Nature, 366, 234-238, 1993.
39. Valet, J.-P., L. Meynadier, F. C. Bassinot, and F. Garnier, Relative paleointensity across the last geomagnetic reversal from sediments of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21(6), 485-488, 1994.
40. Valet, J.-P., and L. Meynadier, Comment on "A relative geomagnetic paleointensity stack from Ontong-Java Plateau sediments for the Matuyama" by Yvo S. Kok and Lisa Tauxe, J. Geophys. Res., 106(B6), 11,013-11,015, 2001.