Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 265-280

  Ehlers, Lars ^a   Klaus, Bettina ^b  

^a Canada H3A 2T7   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242319488     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Abdulkadiroǧlu A, Sönmez T (1998) Random serial dictatorship and the core from random endowments in house allocation problems. Econometrica 66: 689-701
2. Abdulkadiroǧlu A, Sönmez T (1999) House allocation with existing tenants. J Econ Theory 88: 233-260
3. Barberá S, Sonnenschein H, Zhou L (1991) Voting by committees. Econometrica 59: 595-609
4. Bevià C (1998) Fair allocation in a general model with indivisible goods. Rev Econ Design 3: 195-213
5. Bogomolnaia A, Moulin H (2001) A new solution to the random assignment problem. J Econ Theory 100: 295-328
6. Chun Y, Thomson W (1988) Monotonicity properties of bargaining solutions when applied to economics. Math Soc Sci 15: 11-27
7. Ehlers L (2002) Coalitional strategy-proof house allocation. J Econ Theory 105: 298-317
8. Ehlers L, Klaus B, Pápai S (2002) Strategy-proofness and population-monotonicity for house allocation problems. J Math Econ 38: 329-339
9. Ehlers L, Klaus B, Pápai S (2000b) Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems. Working paper
10. Ehlers L, Klaus B (2003) Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems. Working paper
11. Ergin Hİ (2000) Consistency in house allocation problems. J Math Econ 34: 77-97
12. Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer Math Monthly 69: 9-15
13. Klaus B, Miyagawa E (2001) Strategy-proofness, solidarity, and consistency for multiple assignment problems. Int J Game Theory 30: 421-435
14. Ma J (1994) Strategy-proofness and the strict core in a market with indivisibilities. Int J Game Theory 23: 75-83
15. Miyagawa E (2002) Strategy-proofness and the core in house allocation problems. Games Econ Behav 38: 347-361
16. Moulin H, Thomson W (1988) Can everyone benefit from growth? Two difficulties. J Math Econ 17: 339-345
17. Pápai S (2000a) Strategyproof assignment by hierarchical exchange. Econometrica 68: 1403-1433
18. Pápai S (2000b) Strategyproof multiple assignment using quotas. Rev Econ Design 5: 91-105
19. Pápai S (2001) Strategy-proof and nonbossy assignments. J Public Econ Theory 3: 257-271
20. Roth A (1985) The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 36: 277-288
21. Satterthwaite MA Sonnenschein H (1981): Strategy-proof allocation mechanisms at differentiable points. Rev Econ Stud 48: 587-597
22. Svensson L-G (1994) Queue allocation of indivisible goods. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 323-330
23. Svensson L-G (1999) Strategy-proof allocation of indivisible goods. Soc Choice Welfare 16: 557-567
24. Tadenuma K (1996) Trade-off between equity and efficiency in a general economy with indivisible goods. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 445-450
25. Thomson W (1994) Resource-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 205-223