Classification of Broadleaf and Grass Weeds Using Gabor Wavelets and an Artificial Neural Network

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1247-1254

  Tang, L ^a   Tian, L ^b   Steward, B L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadleaf; Gabor wavelets; Grass; Neural network; Real time; Selective weed control; Texture

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CALCULATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; WEED CONTROL;

GABOR WAVELETS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; REAL TIME; TEXTURE; VEGETATION; WAVELET ANALYSIS; WEED;

ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI; ALOPECURUS PRATENSIS; IPOMOEA HEDERACEA; POACEAE; SETARIA FABERI; XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM;

EID: 0242318898     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beck, J., A. Sutter, and R. Ivry. 1987. Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 37(2): 299-325.
2. Bovik, A. C., M. Clark, and W. Geisler. 1990. Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(1): 55-73.
3. Bovik, A. C., N. Gopal, T. Emmoth, and A. Restrepo. 1992. Localized measurement of emergent image frequencies by Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 38(2): 691-712.
4. Daugman, J. G. 1985. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J. Optical Society of America A 2(7): 1160-1169.
5. Davis, L. S., S. A. Johns, and J. K. Aggarwal. 1979. Texture analysis using generalized co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1(2): 252-259.
6. Franz, E., M. R. Gebhardt, and K. B. Unklesbay. 1991. The use of local spectral properties of leaves as an aid for identifying weed seedlings in digital images. Trans. ASAE 32(2): 682-687.
7. Guyer, D. E., G. E. Miles, M. M. Shreiber, O. R. Mitchell, and V. C. Vanderbilt. 1986. Machine vision and image processing for plant identification. Trans. ASAE 29(6): 1500-1507.
8. Guyer, D. E., G. E. Miles, L. D. Gaulttney, and M. M. Schreiber. 1993. Application of machine vision to shape analysis in leaf and plant identification. Trans. ASAE 36(1): 163-171.
9. Haralick, R. M., K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for images classification. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3(2): 610-621.
10. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, and A. R. Martin. 1995. A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution. Weed Research 35(1): 197-205.
11. Mallat, S. 1996. Wavelets for a vision. Proc. IEEE 84(4): 604-614.
12. Meyer, G. E., T. Mehta, M. F. Kocher, D. A. Mortensen, and A. Samal. 1998. Textural imaging and discriminant analysis for distinguishing weeds for spot spraying. Trans. ASAE 41(4): 1189-1197.
13. Mitchell, T. M. 1997. Machine Learning. Boston, Mass.: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
14. Mortensen, D. A., J. A. Dieleman, and G. A. Johnson. 1998. Weed spatial variation and weed management. In Integrated Weed and Soil Management, 293-309. J. L. Hatfield, D. D. Buhler, and B. A. Stewart, eds. Chelsea, Mich.: Ann Arbor Press.
15. Naghdy, G., J. Wang, and P. Ogunbona. 1996. Texture analysis using Gabor wavelets. IS&T/SPIE Symp. Electronic Imaging. Proc. SPIE 2657: 74-85.
16. Novartis. 1998. Sample Labels and Reference Guide. Greensboro, N.C.: Novartis.
17. Porat, M., and Y. Y. Zeevi. 1989. Localized texture processing in vision: Analysis and synthesis in the Gaborian space. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng. 36(1): 115-129.
18. Reed, T. R., and J. M. H. Du Buf. 1993. A review of recent texture segmentation and feature extraction techniques. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding 57(3): 359-372.
19. Shearer, S. A., and R. G. Holmes. 1990. Plant identification using color co-occurrence matrices. Trans. ASAE 33(6): 2037-2044.
20. Stuart, A. 1984. The Ideas of Sampling. New York, N.Y.: Macmillan.
21. Steward, B. L., and L. F. Tian. 1998. Real-time weed detection in outdoor field conditions. In Proc. SPIE 3543: Precision Agriculture and Biological Quality, 266-278. G. E. Meyer and J. A. DeShazer, eds. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE.
22. Tian, L. F., and D. C. Slaughter. 1998. Environmentally adaptive segmentation algorithm for outdoor image segmentation. Computers and Electronics in Agric. 21(3): 153-168.
23. Weszka, J. S., C. R. Dyer, and A. Rosenfeld. 1976. A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 6(1): 269-285.
24. Woebbecke, D. M., G. E. Meyer, K. Von Bargen, and D. A. Mortensen. 1995a. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Trans. ASAE 38(1): 259-269.
25. Woebbecke, D. M., G. E. Meyer, K. Von Bargen, and D. A. Mortensen. 1995b. Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysis. Trans. ASAE 38(1): 271-281.
26. Yonekawa, S., N. Sakai, and O. Kitani, 1996. Identification of idealized leaf types using simple dimensionless shape factors by image analysis. Trans. ASAE 39(4): 1525-1533.