Benchmarking DAML+OIL repositories

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2870, Issue , 2003, Pages 613-627

  Guo, Yuanbo ^a   Heflin, Jeff ^a   Pan, Zhengxiang ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA DESCRIPTION; QUERY PROCESSING; SEMANTIC WEB;

BENCHMARK EXPERIMENTS; CUSTOMIZABLE; DATA SET; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; LARGE DATASETS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; SYNTHETIC DATA;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 0242308052     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_39     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. R. Agrawal, A. Somani, and Y. Xu. Storage and Querying of E-Commerce Data. In Proc. of VLDB 2001, the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 2001.
2. S. Alexaki et al. On Storing Voluminous RDF Description: The case of Web Portal Catalogs. In Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB2001) in conjunction with ACM SIGMOD'01 Conference. 2001.
3. D. Bitton, D. DeWitt, and C. Turbyfill. Benchmarking Database Systems, a Systematic Approach. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 1983.
4. D. Bitton and C. Turbyfill. A Retrospective on the Wisconsin Benchmark. In Readings in Database Systems, Second Edition. 1994.
5. R.G.G. Cattell. An Engineering Database Benchmark. In Readings in Database Systems, Second Edition. 1994.
6. Dan Connolly et al. DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description. http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference
7. Mike Dean et al. Web Ontology Language (OWL) Reference Version 1.0. W3C Working Draft 12 November 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20021112
8. Quentin Elhaik, M-C Rousset, and Bernard Ycart. Generating Random Benchmarks for Description Logics. In Proceedings of DL'98. 1998.
9. Richard Fikes et al. DAML Query Language (April 2003). http://www.daml.org/2003/04/dql
10. Gensereth M., Fikes R. Knowledge Interchange Format. Stanford Logic Report Logic-92-1, Stanford Univ. http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html
11. M. Gertz and K. Sattler. A Model and Architecture for Conceptualized Data Annotations. Technical Report, Dept. of Computer Science, University of California, Davis. 2001.
12. Jeff Heflin. Univ 1.0 Ontology. http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/DAML/onts/univ1.0.daml
13. Jeff Heflin and Zhengxiang Pan. Univ-Bench Ontology. http://www.lehigh.edu/∼zhp2/univ-bench.daml
14. I. Horrocks. Benchmark Analysis with FaCT. In Proc. of TABLEAUX 2000. 2000.
15. I. Horrocks. The FaCT System. In Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods: International Conference (Tableaux'98). 1998.
16. Horrocks, I. and Patel-Schneider, P. DL systems comparison. In Proceedings of DL'98. 1998.
17. G. Karvounarakis, V. Christophides, D. Plexousakis, and S. Alexaki. Querying Community Web Portals. Technical report, Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, Heraklion, Greece. 2000. http://www.ics.forth.gr/proj/isst/RDF/RQL/rql.pdf
18. A. Magkanaraki et al. Benchmarking RDF schemas for the Semantic Web. In Proc. of First International Semantic Web Conference. 2002.
19. S. Melnik. Storing RDF in a relational database. http://www-db.stanford.edu/∼melnik/rdf/db.html
20. Zhengxiang Pan and Jeff Heflin. DLDB: Extending Relational Databases to Support Semantic Web Queries. Submitted to Workshop on Practical and Scaleable Semantic Systems, International Semantic Web Conference 2003.
21. Michael Sintek and Stefan Decker. TRIPLE - A Query, Inference, and Transformation Language for the Semantic Web. In Proc. of First International Semantic Web Conference. 2002.
22. M. Stonebraker et al. The SEQUIOA 2000 Storage Benchmark. In Readings in Database Systems, Second Edition. 1994.
23. World Wide Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/