Rhetorical coding of health promotion dialogues

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2780 LNAI, Issue , 2003, Pages 179-188

  Grasso, Floriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION MODEL; BEHAVIOURAL MODEL; COMPLEX ACTIVITY; HEALTH PROMOTION;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH CARE;

HEALTH PROMOTION DIALOGUES; RHETORICAL CODING;

EID: 0242307921     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39907-0_26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Fries, E., Croyle, R.: Stereotypes Associated with a Low-Fat Diet and their Relevance to Nutrition Education. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 93 (1993) 551-555.
2. Sadalla, E., Burroughs, J.: Profiles in Eating: Sexy Vegetarians and Other Diet- Based Social Stereotypes. Psychology Today 15 (1981) 51-57.
3. Grasso, F., Cawsey, A., Jones, R.: Dialectical Argumentation to Solve Conflicts in Advice Giving: A case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (2000) 1077-1115.
4. Cawsey, A., Grasso, F., Jones, R.: A Conversational Model for Health Promotion on the World Wide Web. [25] 379-388.
5. Prochaska, J., Clemente, C.D.: Stages of Change in the Modification of Problem Behavior. In Hersen, M., Eisler, R., Miller, P., eds.: Progress in Behavior Modification. Volume 28. Sycamore Publishing Company, Sycamore, IL (1992).
6. Prochaska, J.: Strong and Weak Principles for Progressing from Precontemplation to Action on the Basis of Twelve Problem Behaviors. Health Psychology 13 (1994).
7. Cawsey, A., Grasso, F.: Goals and Attitude Change in Generation: A Case Study in Health Education. In Jokinen, K., Maybury, M., Zock, M., Zukerman, I., eds.: Proceedings of the ECAI-96 Workshop on: Gaps and Bridges: New directions in Planning and NLG. (1996) 19-23.
8. Reiter, E., Robertson, R., Osman, L.: Types of Knowledge Required to Personalize Smoking Cessation Letters. [25] 389-399.
9. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press (1958).
10. Reed, C., Norman, T., eds.: Symposium on Argument and Computation: position papers. In Reed, C., Norman, T., eds.: Symposium on Argument and Computation: position papers, http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/̃tnorman/sac/(2000) .
11. Carenini, G., Grasso, F., Reed, C., eds.: Proceedings of the ECAI 2002 workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. In Carenini, G., Grasso, F., Reed, C., eds.: Proceedings of the ECAI 2002 workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. (2002).
12. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana (1969).
13. Grasso, F.: Towards a framework for rhetorical argumentation. In Bos, J., Foster, M., Matheson, C., eds.: EDILOG'02: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, Edinburgh (2002) 53-60.
14. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J., Pollack, M., eds.: Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1990) 221-255.
15. Searle, J.: Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969).
16. Barrie, K.: Motivational Counselling in Groups. In Davidson, R., Stephem, R., MacEwan, I., eds.: Counselling Problem Drinkers. Tavistock/Routledge, London (1991).
17. Mann, W., Thompson, S.: Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text 8 (1988) 243-281.
18. Reed, C., Long, D.: Generating the structure of argument. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98). (1998) 1091-1097.
19. Stent, A., Allen, J.: Annotating Argumentation Acts in Spoken Dialog. Technical Report 740, The University of Rochester, Computer Science Department (2000) (TRAINS Technical Note 00-1).
20. Teufel, S., Carletta, J., Moens, M.: An Annotation Scheme for Discourse-Level Argumentation in Research Articles. In: Proceedings of EACL. (1999).
21. Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty Sneddon, G., Anderson, A.: The Reliability of a Dialogue Structure Coding Scheme. Computational Linguistics 23 (1997) 13-31.
22. Core, M., Allen, J.: Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In Traum, D., ed.: AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines. (1997).
23. Fox, J., Das, S.: Safe and Sound: Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2000).
24. Carletta, J.: Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The kappa Statistic. Computational Linguistics 22 (1996) 249-254.
25. P.W. Horn, Shahar, Y., Lindberg, G., S. Andreassen, Wyatt, J., eds.: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Medical Decision Making, AIMDM'99. Volume 1620 of LNAI., Springer-Verlag (1999).