Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: Application to rock and soil sites with implications for nonlinear site response

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1691-1702

  Roumelioti, Zafeiria ^a   Beresnev, Igor A ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; EARTHQUAKES; RANDOM PROCESSES; ROCKS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS;

GROUND MOTIONS;

SEISMOLOGY;

CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE 1999; GROUND MOTION; NONLINEARITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SITE EFFECT; SOIL;

TAIWAN;

EID: 0242306044     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120020218     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aki, K. (1993). Local site effects on weak and strong ground motions, Tectonophysics 218, 93-111.
2. Anderson, J. G., and S. E. Hough (1984). A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 1969-1993.
3. Berardi, R., M. J. Jiménez, G. Zonno, and M. García-Fernández (2000). Calibration of stochastic finite-fault ground motion simulations for the 1997 Umbria-Marche, central Italy, earthquake sequence, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 20, 315-324.
4. Beresnev, I. A. (2002). Nonlinearity at California generic soil sites from modeling recent strong-motion data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 863-870.
5. Beresnev, I. A., and G. M. Atkinson (1998a). FINSIM: a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults, Seism. Res. Lett. 69, 27-32.
6. Beresnev, I. A., and G. M. Atkinson (1998b). Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. I. Validation on rock sites, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1392-1401.
7. Beresnev, I. A., and G. M. Atkinson (2001). Subevent structure of large earthquakes: a ground motion perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 53-56.
8. Beresnev, I. A., and G. M. Atkinson (2002). Source parameters of earthquakes in eastern and western North America based on finite-fault modeling, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 695-710.
9. Beresnev, I. A., and K.-L. Wen (1996). Nonlinear soil response: a reality? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1964-1978.
10. Beresnev, I. A., G. M. Atkinson, P. A. Johnson, and E. H. Field (1998a). Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. II. Widespread nonlinear response at soil sites, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1402-1410.
11. Beresnev, I. A., E. H. Field, K. Van Den Abeele, and P. A. Johnson (1998b). Magnitude of nonlinear sediment response in Los Angeles basin during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1079-1084.
12. Boore, D. M., and W. B. Joyner (1997). Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 327-341.
13. Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2003). Updated near-source ground motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 314-331.
14. w 6), UmbriaMarche (central Italy) earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 27-39.
15. Chang, G., Y. M. Wu, and T. C. Shin (2000). Relocating the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan, TAO 11, 581-590.
16. Chen, K. C., T. C. Shin, and J. H. Wang (1989). Estimates of coda Q in Taiwan, Proc. Geol. Soc. China 32, 339-353.
17. Chi, W.-C., D. Dreger, and A. Kaverina (2001). Finite-source modeling of the 1999 Taiwan (Chi-Chi) earthquake derived from a dense strong-motion network, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1144-1157.
18. Cultrera, G., D. M. Boore, W. B. Joyner, and C. M. Dietel (1999). Nonlinear soil response in the vicinity of the Van Norman Complex following the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1214-1231.
19. Das, S., and B. V. Kostrov (1994). Diversity of solutions of the problem of earthquake faulting inversion: application to SH waves for the great 1989 Macquarie Ridge earthquake, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 85, 293-318.
20. Delouis, B. D. Giardini, P. Lundgren, and J. Salichon (2002). Joint inversion of InSAR, GPS, teleseismic, and strong-motion data for the spatial and temporal distribution of earthquake slip: application to the 1999 Izmit mainshock, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 278-299.
21. w 6.7), J. Seism. 6, 247-255.
22. Dimitriu, P., N. Theodulidis, and P.-Y. Bard (2000). Evidence of nonlinear site response in HVSR from SMART1 (Taiwan) data, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 20, 155-165.
23. Erdik, M., and E. Durukal (2003). Simulation modeling of strong ground motion, in Earthquake Engineering Handbook, W. F. Chen and C. Scawthorn (Editors), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 6-16-67.
24. Field, E. H., P. A. Johnson, I. A. Beresnev, and Y. Zeng (1997). Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Nature 390, 599-602.
25. Field, E. H., S. Kramer, A.-W. Elgamal, J. D. Bray, N. Matasovic, P. A. Johnson, C. Cramer, C. Roblee, D. J. Wald, L. F. Bonilla, P. P. Dimitriu, and J. G. Anderson (1998a). Nonlinear site response: where we're at, Seism. Res. Lett. 69, 230-234.
26. Field, E. H., Y. Zeng, P. A. Johnson, and I. A. Beresnev (1998b). Nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge earthquake: observations and finite-source simulations, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 26,869-26,883.
27. Hartzell, S. (1998). Variability in nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1426-1437.
28. Hartzell, S., S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, and S. Larsen (1999). Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: comparison of methods and validation using strong ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1484-1504.
29. Hough, S. E., S. Martin, R. Bilham, and G. M. Atkinson (2002). The 26 January 2001 7.6 Bhuj, India earthquake: observed and predicted ground motions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 2061-2079.
30. w 5.9): implications for seismic hazard in Mexico City from inslab earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1060-1071.
31. Ishihara, K. (1996). Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics, Clarendon, London, 350 pp.
32. Lee, C.-T., C.-T. Cheng, C.-W. Liao, and Y.-B. Tsai (2001a). Site classification of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1283-1297.
33. Lee, W. H. K., T. C. Shin, K. W. Kuo, K. C. Chen, and C. F. Fu (2001b). CWB free-field strong-motion data from the 21 September Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1370-1376.
34. Lee, W. H. K., T. C. Shin, and C. F. Wu (2001c). Free-field strong-motion data from 30 early aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-chi earthquake, Seismological Observation Center, Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan (CD-ROM).
35. Lee, W. H. K., T. C. Shin, and C. F. Wu (2001d). Free-field strong-motion data from three major aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-chi earthquake, Seismological Observation Center, Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan (CD-ROM).
36. Ma, K.-F., J. Mori, S.-J. Lee, and S. B. Yu (2001). Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1069-1087.
37. Olson, A. H., and J. G. Anderson (1988). Implications of frequency-domain inversion of earthquake ground motions for resolving the space-time dependence of slip on an extended fault, Geophys. J. 94, 443-455.
38. Ou, G.-B., and R. B. Herrmann (1990). A statistical model for ground motion produced by earthquakes at local and regional distances, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1397-1417.
39. Roumelioti, Z., and A. Kiratzi (2002). Stochastic simulation of strong-motion records from the 15 April 1979 (M 7.1) Montenegro earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1095-1101.
40. Silva, W. J., N. Abrahamson, G. Toro, and C. Costantino (1997). Description and Validation of the Stochastic Ground Motion Model, report to Brookhaven National Laboratory, Associated Universities, Inc., Upton, New York.
41. w 7.6) and for future earthquakes in India. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 353-370.
42. Sokolov, V. (2000). Spectral parameters of ground motion in different regions: comparison of empirical models, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 19, 173-181.
43. Su, F., J. G. Anderson, and Y. Zeng (1998). Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1411-1425.
44. Wang, W.-H., S-H. Chang, and C.-H. Chen (2001). Fault slip inverted from surface displacements during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1167-1181.
45. Wu, C., M. Takeo, and S. Ide (2001). Source process of the Chi-Chi earthquake: a joint inversion of strong motion data and global positioning system data with a multifault model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1128-1143.
46. Zeng, Y., and C.-H. Chen (2001). Fault rupture of the 20 September 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1088-1098.