The Politics of Health Care Policy: The United States in comparative perspective

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 592-599

  Benoit, Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0242301623     PISSN: 00315982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0080     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance, Board on Health care Services. 2002. Health insurance is a family matter. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
2. International Social Survey Program (ISSP). 1992. International Social Survey Program 1992: Social Inequality II. Data compiled at Zentralarchiv, Univ. of Cologne, Germany.
3. International Social Survey Program (ISSP). 1996. International Social Survey Program 1996: Role of government III. Data compiled at Zentralarchiv, Univ. of Cologne, Germany.
4. Lipset, S. M. 1990. Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
5. Maioni, A. 1998. Parting at the crossroads: The emergence of health insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
6. OECD. 2001. OECD Health Data 2001: A comparative analysis of 29 countries (CD-Rom). Paris: OECD and CREDES.
7. Olsen, G. 2002. The politics of the welfare state: Canada, Sweden, and the United States. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Ragin, C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
9. Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
10. United Nations Development Program. 2000. Human development report 2000. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.