Effect of High Sensitivity in a Computerized Scheme for Detecting Extremely Subtle Solitary Pulmonary Nodules in Chest Radiographs: Observer Performance Study

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1302-1311

  Shiraishi, Junji ^a   Abe, Hiroyuki ^a   Engelmann, Roger ^a   Doi, Kunio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Chest radiograph; Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); Image database; Lung nodule; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

Indexed keywords

ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GRANULOMA; HAMARTOMA; HUMAN; LARGE CELL CARCINOMA; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG ALVEOLUS CELL CARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LUNG METASTASIS; LUNG NODULE; LUNG SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TUBERCULOMA;

EID: 0242299655     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00463-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2002. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2002
2. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 10:354: 99-105.
3. Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Uhlenhopp MA. Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983; 148:609-615.
4. Austin JHM, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992; 182:115-122.
5. Giger ML, Doi K, MacMahon H. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 3: Automated detection of nodules in peripheral lung field. Med Phys 1988; 15:158-166.
6. Suzuki H, Inaoka N, Takabatake H, et al. Development of a computer-aided detection system for lung cancer diagnosis. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 1992; 1652:567-571.
7. Lampeter WA, Wandtke JC. Computerized search of chest radiographs for nodules. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:384-390.
8. Lo SCB, Freedman MT, Lin JSJ, Mun SK. Automatic lung nodule detection using profile matching and back-propagation neural network techniques. J Digit Imaging 1993; 6:48-54.
9. Xu XW, Doi K, Kobayashi T, MacMahon H, Giger ML. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys 1997; 24:1395-1403.
10. Carreira MJ, Cabello D, Penedo MG, Mosquera A. Computer-aided diagnoses: automatic detection of lung nodules. Med Phys 1998; 25:1998-2006.
11. Freedman MT, Lo SCB, Osicka T, et al. Computer aided detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: effect of machine CAD false positive locations on radiologists' behavior. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 2002; 4684:1311-1319.
12. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, et al. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1102-1110.
13. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, et al. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001; 221:633-640.
14. Matsumoto T, Doi K, Kano A, Nakamura H, Nakanishi T. Evaluation of the potential benefit of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for lung cancer screening using photofluorography: analysis of an observer study. Nippon Acta Radiol 1993; 53:1195-1207.
15. Shiraishi J, Katsuragawa S, Ikezoe J, et al. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:71-74.
16. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection scheme. Med Phys 1994; 21:265-269.
17. Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562.
18. Shiraishi J, Abe H, Engelmann R, Bae KT, Doi K. Effect of the number of cases in image database on the performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 2003; 5302:177-182.
19. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
20. MacMahon H, Engelmann R, Behlen FM, Hoffmann KR, Roe C, Metz CE, Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test. Radiology 1999; 213:723-726.
21. Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K. Effect of computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs. Radiology 1996; 199:843-848.
22. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. ROC rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:723-731.
23. Roe CA, Metz CE. The Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality ROC data: validation by computer simulation. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:298-303.
24. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
25. Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ. Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 1975; 116:533-538.
26. Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 1990; 174:873-881.