Negotiating medications: Patient perceptions of long-term medication use

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 409-417

  Carder, P C ^a   Vuckovic, N ^b   Green, C A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Chronic illness; Compliance; Medication; Negotiation; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISEASE COURSE; EMOTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERCEPTION; PRESCRIPTION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCHIZOAFFECTIVE PSYCHOSIS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SIDE EFFECT; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF CONCEPT; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 0242298770     PISSN: 02694727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-4727.2003.00511.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benson J, Britten N (2002) Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 325, 873-876.
2. Donavan JL (1995) Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research. International Journal of Technological Assessment in Health Care, 11, 443-455.
3. Donavan JL, Blake DR, Fleming WG (1989) The patient is not a blank sheet: lay beliefs and the relevance to patient education. British Journal of Rheumatism, 28, 58-61.
4. Hayes-Bautista D (1976) Modifying the treatment: patient compliance, patient control and medical care. Social Science & Medicine, 10, 233-238.
5. Montagne M (1988) The metaphorical nature of drugs and drug taking. Social Science & Medicine, 26, 417-424.
6. Montagne M (1992) The promotion of medications for personal and social problems. Journal of Drug Issues, 22, 389-406.
7. Montagne M (1996) The pharmakon phenomenon: cultural conceptions of drugs and drug use. In: Davis P, ed. Contested ground: public concern and private interest in the regulation of pharmaceuticals. NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 11-25.
8. Rhodes T, Moore D (2001) On the qualitative in drugs research: part one. Addiction Research and Theory, 9, 279-297.
9. Robertson MHB (1992) The meaning of compliance: patient perspectives. Qualitative Health Research, 2, 7-22.
10. Stevenson FA, Dip PG, Britten N, Barry CA, Barber N, Bradley CP (2000) Qualitative methods and prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 25, 317-324.
11. Conrad P (1985) The meaning of medications: another look at compliance. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 29-37.
12. Karp D (1997) Speaking of sadness. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Vuckovic N, Nichter M (1997) Changing patterns of pharmaceutical practice in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1285-1302.
14. Vuckovic N (1999) Fast relief: buying time with medications. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 13, 51-68.
15. Charmaz K (1995) The body, identity, and self: adapting to impairment. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 657-680.
16. Estroff SE (1989) Self, identity, and subjective experiences of schizophrenia: in search of the subject. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 189-196.
17. Estroff SE (1995) Brokenhearted lifetimes: ethnography, subjectivity, and psychosocial rehabilitation. International Journal of Mental Health, 24, 82-92.
18. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J (2001) Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 26, 331-342.
19. Green CA, Vuckovic NH, Firemark AJ (2002) Adapting to psychiatric disability and needs for home-and community-based care. Mental Health Services Research, 4, 29-41.
20. Green CA, Vuckovic N, Bourgeois P, deJesus A, Hornbrook M, Brody K, McKenzie M (In press) Chapter VI. Infants, children, and non-elderly adults with disabilities. In: Leutz W, Greenlick M, Nonnenkamp L, eds. Bridging the gap: practical models for linking and coordinating medical care and community care for people with disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Charmaz K (2000) Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage, pp. 509-536.
22. Muhr T (1997) ATLAS/ti visual qualitative data analysis-management-model building release 4.1 short user's manual, 1st edn. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.
23. Strauss A (1978) Negotiations: varieties, contexts, processes and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
24. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C (1985) The social organisation of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Maines DR (1982) In search of mesostructure: studies in negotiated order. Urban Life, 11, 267-279.
26. Maines DR, Charlton JC (1985) The negotiated order approach to the analysis of social organization. In: Farberman HA, Perinbanayagam PS, eds. Studies in symbolic interaction. Greenwich, CT, USA: JAI Press, pp. 271-308.