Civility and democratic spirit: Results of a representative research in the Czech Republic and Slovakia;Občanský éthos a demokratičnost: Výsledky reprezentativního výzkumu v České Republice a na Slovensku

Ceskoslovenska Psychologie

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 301-318

  Klicperová Baker, Martina ^a  

^a PSYCHOLOGICKÝ ÚSTAV AV CR   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Democracy; Political culture; Post communism; Q factor analysis; Virtues

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242297796     PISSN: 0009062X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Almond, G. A., Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Banfield, E. C. (Ed.) (1995). Občanské ctnosti. Praha: Victoria Publishing.
3. Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. New York: Basic Books.
4. Freedom House (2002). www.freedomhouse.org [datum přístupu, leden 2003].
5. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Free Press.
6. GfK. Institut für Marketforschung (1996). Sociostyles. Praha: GfK.
7. Hefner, R. W. (1998). Demcratic civility. London: Transaction Publishers.
8. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. London: MC Graw-Hill.
9. Inkeles, A, Sasaki, M. (1996). Comapring nations and cultures. Reading in a cross disciplinary perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
10. Klicperová, M. Feierabend, I. K., Hofstetter, C. R. (1997) In the search for a post-communist syndrome. A theoretical framework and empirical assessment. J. of Community and Applied Social Psychology (7) 39-52.
11. Klicperová, M. (1997). Občanské ctnosti a transformace české společnosti. Československá. psychologie, 41 (2) 97-108.
12. Klicperová.M. (1998). Post-totalitní syndrom? Československá psychologie, 42 (4) 344-350.
13. Klicperová-Baker, M. (Ed.) (1999). Ready for Democracy? Civic culture and civility with a focus on Czech society. Prague: Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
14. Klicperová-Baker, M. et al. (2003). Democratic citizenship in comparative perspective: Psychological theory and empirical studies in four nations. San Diego: San Diego State University, Montezuma Publishing.
15. Levine, R., Martiney, T., Brase, G., Sorenson, K. (1994). Helping in 36 U.S. cities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 69-81.
16. Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., KlicperováBaker, M. (1999). Civility in a cross-cultural perspective. In: Klicperová-Baker, M. (Ed.) (1999). Ready for democracy? Civic culture and civility with a focus on Czech society. Prague: Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
17. Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32, 543-560.
18. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.
19. Masaryk, T. G. (1990). Ideály humanitní. Praha: Melantrich.
20. Pew Charitable Trusts (2002). Aggravating circumstances: A status report on rudeness in America, www.pewtrusts.com [datum přístupu: leden 2003].
21. Price Waterhouse (2002). http://www.opacity-index.com/ind_whatwhy.html [datum přístupu: leden 2003].
22. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond invidivualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In: U. Kim, H. Triandis, G. Zoon (Eds.) Individualism and collectivism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 85-102.
23. Seligman, A. B. (1992). The idea of civil society. New York: Free Press.
24. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
25. de Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
26. Transparency International (2002). www.transparency.org [datum přístupu: prosinec 2002].
27. Triandis, H. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.