On the modelling of the particle dynamics in electro-hydrodynamic flow fields: II. Influences of inhomogeneities on electrostatic precipitation

Powder Technology

Volumn 135-136, Issue , 2003, Pages 136-149

  Schmid, Hans Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

EHD; Electric field; Electrostatic precipitation; Modelling; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROSTATICS; FLUXES; STATISTICAL METHODS; TURBULENCE;

COLLECTING ELECTRODES (CE);

POWDERS;

ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PARTICLE FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW;

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENSITY; DUST; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 0242289238     PISSN: 00325910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Schmid H.-J., Vogel L. On the modelling of the particle dynamics in electro-hydrodynamic flow-fields: I. Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian modelling approach. Powder Technol. 135-136:2003;118-135 (this issue).
2. Soldati A. On the effects of the electrohydrodynamic flows and turbulence on aerosol transport and collection in wire-plate electrostatic precipitators. J. Aerosol Sci. 31:2000;293-305.
3. Sørensen L.S., Larsen P.S., Christensen E.M. Secondary flow and turbulence in negative corona precipitator with large diameter, barbed electrodes. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Electrostatic Precipitation, Padova, Italy. 1987;421-431.
4. Schmid H.-J. Zum Partikeltransport in elektrischen Abscheidern. 1999;Shaker-Verlag, Aachen.
5. Meroth A.M. Numerical Electrohydrodynamics in Electrostatic Precipitators. 1997;Logos-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Bouziane A., Hidaka K., Taplamacioglu M.C., Waters R.T. Assessment of corona models based on the Deutsch approximation. J. Phys. D. 27:1994;320-329.
7. Schmid H.-J., Stolz S., Buggisch H. On the modelling of electro-hydrodynamic flow fields in electrostatic precipitators. Flow Turbul. Combust. 68:2002;63-89.
8. Riehle C. On measuring and modelling local average particle velocities for particle ensembles in classifying systems. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 12:1995;299-303.
9. Graham D.I., Moyeed R.A. How many particles for my Lagrangian simulations? Powder Technol. 125:2002;179-186.
10. Engel A. Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und Statistik (Band 1). 1984;Klett-Verlag, Stuttgart.
11. Schmid H.-J., Veith S., Umhauer H. In-situ measurement of local particle flux densities in a complex two-phase flow. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 19:2002;203-215.
12. Schmid H.-J., Umhauer H. Electrostatic precipitator efficiency in the fine particle regime. Trans. Filtr. Soc. 2:2002;135-141.
13. Miller J., Riehle C., Schwab A.J., Löffler F. Numerische Feldberechnung in Elektrofiltern im Hinblick auf elektrisch ähnliche Betriebszustände. J. Electrostat. 33:1994;213-228.