Female zebrafish (danio rerio) do not prefer mutant longfin males

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 501-502

  Kitevski, Boris ^a   Pyron, Mark ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; MATE CHOICE; ORNAMENTATION; SOCIAL STATUS;

DANIO RERIO;

EID: 0242275433     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2003.9663988     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Andersson, M., and Iwasa, Y., 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Ecol., 11:53–58.
2. Bischoff, R. J., Gould, J. L., and Rubenstein, D. I., Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 17253–255.
3. McPeek, M. A., 1992. Mechanisms of sexual selection operating on body size in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Behav. Ecol., 3:1–12.
4. Parker, G. A., 1992. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in fish. J. Fish Biol., 41 (Supplement B):1–20.
5. Pyron, M., 1995. Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 36:407–412.
6. Pyron, M., 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and phylogeny in North American minnows. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 57:327–341.
7. Pyron, M., 2003. Female preferences and male-male interactions in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Can. J. Zool., 81:122–125.
8. SYSTAT:. 1992. Statistics, Version 5.2.1 Evanston, IL