Grade 2 Chondrosarcoma: Stage I or Stage II Tumor?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 415, Issue , 2003, Pages 45-51

  Reith, John D ^a   Horodyski, Mary Beth ^a   Scarborough, Mark T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHONDROSARCOMA; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKELETON; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 0142259175     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo0000093895.12372.c1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Aigner T, Muller S, Neureiter, et al: Prognostic relavence of cell biologic and biochemical features in conventional chondrosarcomas. Cancer 94:2273-2281, 2002.
2. Coindre JM, Trojani M, Contesso, et al: Reproducibility of a histopathologic grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 58:306-309, 1986.
3. Coughlin B, Feliz A, Ishida T, Czemiak B, Dorfman HD: p53 expression and DNA ploidy of cartilage lesions, Hum Pathol 26:620-624, 1995.
4. Dahlin DC, Beabout JW: Dedifferentiation of low-grade chondrosarcomas. Cancer 28:461-466, 1971.
5. Dahlin DC, Henderson ED: Chondrosarcoma: A surgical and pathological problem. J Bone Joint Surg 38A:1025-1038, 1956.
6. Enneking WF: A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop 204:9-24, 1986.
7. Evans HL, Ayala AG, Romsdahl MM: Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: A clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer 40:818-831, 1977.
8. Fiorenza F, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, et al: Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:93-99, 2002.
9. Gitelis S, Bertoni F, Picci P, Campanacci M: Chondrosarcoma of bone: The experience at the Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:1248-1257, 1981.
10. Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Nojima T, et al. Validity and reproducibility of histologic diagnosis and grading for adult soft-tissue sarcomas. Hum Pathol 33:111-115, 2002.
11. Henderson ED, Dahlin DC: Chondrosarcoma of bone: A study of two hundred and eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg 45A:1450-1458, 1963.
12. Kilpatrick SE, Abdul-Karim F, Renner JB, et al: Interobserver variability among expert orthopedic pathologists for diagnosis, histologic grade, and determination of the necessity for chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Pediatr Pathol Mol Med 19:337-358, 2000.
13. Kreicbergs A, Boquist L, Borgssen B, et al: Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma: A comparative study of cellular DNA content and clinicopathologic features. Cancer 50: 577-583, 1982.
14. Kusuzaki K, Murata H, Takeshita H, et al: Usefulness of cytofluorometric DNA ploidy analysis in distinguishing benign cartilaginous tumors from chondrosarcomas. Mod Pathol 12:863-872, 1999.
15. Larramendy ML, Mandahl N, Mertens F, et al: Clinical significance of genetic imbalances revealed by comparative genomic hybridization in chondrosarcomas. Hum Pathol 30:1247-1253, 1999.
16. Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G, et al: Chondrosarcoma of bone: An assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg 81A:326-338, 1999.
17. McCarthy EF, Dorfman HD: Chondrosarcoma of bone with dedifferentiation: A study of eighteen cases. Hum Pathol 13:36-40, 1982.
18. McCluggage WG, Walsh MY, Thornton CM, Hamilton PW, Date A, Caughley LM, Bharucha H: Interand intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:206-210, 1998.
19. Mirra JM, Gold R, Downs J, Eckardt JJ: A new histologic approach to the differentiation of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of the bones: A clinicopathologic analysis of 51 cases. Clin Orthop 201: 214-237, 1985.
20. Ooms EC, Anderson WA, Alons CL, Boon ME, Veldhuizen RW: Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumors. Hum Pathol 14:140-143, 1983.
21. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Blasius S, Winkelmann W: Metastasis of chondrosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 122: 625-628, 1996.
22. Ozaki T, Lindner N, Hillmann A, et al: Influence of intralesional surgery on treatment outcome of chondrosarcoma. Cancer 77:1292-1297, 1996.
23. Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Dahlin DC, Medley BE: Chondrosarcoma: A clinicopathologic and statistical analysis. Cancer 45:149-157, 1980.
24. Rizzo M, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP: Chondrosarcoma of bone: Analysis of 108 cases and evaluation for predictors of outcome. Clin Orthop 391:224-233, 2000.
25. Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N, et al: Histological grading of breast carcinomas: A study of interobserver agreement. Hum Pathol 26:873-879, 1995.
26. Sanerkin NG: The diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma of bone: A combined cytologic and histologic approach. Cancer 45:582-594, 1980.
27. Sawyer JR, Swanson CM, Lukacs JL, et al: Evidence of an association between 6q13-21 chromosome aberrations and locally aggressive behavior in patients with cartilage tumors. Cancer 82:474-483, 1998.
28. Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Johnson ME, et al: Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: Prognostic factors for 67 patients treated with definitive surgery. Cancer 78:745-750, 1996.
29. Terek RM, Schwartz GK, Devaney K, et al: Chemotherapy and P-glycoprotein expression in chondrosarcoma. J Orthop Res 16:585-590, 1998.