Formation Porosity Estimation from Density Logs

Petrophysics

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 306-316

  Ellis, Darwin ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER DOLL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SCATTERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

PETROPHYSICS;

POROSITY;

EID: 0142250442     PISSN: 15299074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bourgeois et al, 1998, Pushing the limits of formation evaluation while drilling: Oilfield Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 39-39 (reproduced with permission).
2. Ellis, Darwin V., 1989, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, Elsevier.
3. Eyl, K. A., Chapellat, H., Chevalier, P., Flaum, C., Whittaker, S. J., Jammes, L., Becker, A. J., and Groves, J., 1994, High-resolution density logging using a three detector device, paper SPE-28407, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 467-480.
4. Gaymard, R. and Poupon, A., 1968, Response of neutron and formation density logs in hydrocarbon-bearing formations: The Log Analyst, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 3.
5. Hansen, Pia and Shray, Frank, 1996, Unraveling the differences between LWD and Wireline Measurements, paper T, in 37th Annual Logging Symposium, Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts.
6. Herron, Susan L. and Herron, Michael M., 2000, Application of nuclear spectroscopy logs to the derivation of formation matrix density, paper JJ, in 41st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts.
7. Schlumberger, 1989, Log Interpretation Principles/Applications.