Continuous-Time Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output Wiener Modeling Method

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 5583-5595

  Bhandari, Nidhi ^a   Rollins, Derrick K ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PSEUDO-RANDOM SEQUENCE DESIGN (PRSD);

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; DATA ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; LINEAR SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PROCESS CONTROL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0142245657     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie020955l     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Holcomb, T. R.; Rhodes, C. A.; Morari, M. Input/Output Modeling for Process Control. In Methods of Model Based Process Control; Berber, R., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
2. Normandin, A.; Thibault, J.; Grandjean, B. P. A. Optimizing Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Fermenter using a Neural Network. Bioprocess Eng. 1994, 10, 109.
3. Carrier, J. F.; Stephanopoulos, G. Wavelet-Based Modulation in Control-Relevant Process Identification. AIChE J. 1998, 44 (2), 341.
4. Pearson, R. K.; Ogunnaike, B. A.; Doyle, F. J. Identification of structurally constrained second-order Volterra models. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1996, 44, 2837.
5. Pearson, R. K.; Ogunnaike, B. A. Nonlinear Process Identification. In Nonlinear Process Control; Henson, M. A., Seborg, D. E., Eds.; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.
6. Chen, V. C. P.; Rollins, D. K. Issues Regarding Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Reactors and Fermenters. J. Bioprocess Eng. 2000, 20, 85.
7. Pearson, R. K.; Pottman, M. Gray-box identification of block-oriented nonlinear models. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 301.
8. Fang, Y.; Chow, T. W. S. Orthogonal Wavelet Neural Networks Applying to Identification of Wiener model. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl. 2000, 47 (4), 591.
9. Kalafatis, A.; Arifin, N.; Wang, L.; Cluett, W. L. A new approach to the identification of pH processes based on the Wiener model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 3693.
10. Lacy, S. L.; Erwin, R. S.; Bernstein, D. S. Identification of Wiener Systems with Known Noninvertible Nonlinearities. Trans. ASME 2001, 123, 566.
11. Al-Duwaish, H.; Karim, M. N.; Chandrasekar, V. Use of multilayer feedforward neural networks in identification and control of Wiener model. IEE Proc.: Control Theory Appl. 1996, 143, 255.
12. Ikonen, E.; Najim, K. Nonlinear process modeling based on a Wiener approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part 1: J. Syst. Control Eng. 2001, 215, 15.
13. Jeong, B.; Yoo, K.; Rhee, H. Nonlinear model predictive control using a Wiener model of a continuous methyl methacrylate polymerization reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5968.
14. Rollins, D. K.; Smith, P.; Liang, J. M. Accurate Simplistic Predictive Modeling of Nonlinear Dynamic Processes. ISA Trans. 1998, 36, 293.
15. Rollins, D. K.; Bhandari, N.; Bassily, A. M.; Colver, G. M.; Chin, S. A continuous-time nonlinear dynamic predictive modeling method for Hammerstein processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42 (4), 861.
16. Rollins, D. K.; Bhandari, N.; Pacheco, L. Experimental Designs that Maximize Information for Nonlinear Dynamic Processes. Proceedings of FOCAPO, Coral Springs, FL, 2003; p 463.
17. Rollins, D. K.; Bascunana, M. V.; Larson, G. L. DOE for Block-Oriented Dynamic Systems. Technometrics 2003, submitted for publication.
18. Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1984.