Transparency Versus Collective Action: Fujimori's Legacy and the Peruvian Congress

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 983-1006

  Carey, John M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Coalitions; Legislatures; Parties; Peru; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142231390     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414003257096     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. American Political Science Association. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system: A report of the Committee on Political Parties. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Balbi, C. R., & Palmer, D. S. (2001). "Reinventing" democracy in Peru. Current History, 100(643), 65-72.
4. Barczak, M. (2001). Representation by consultation? The rise of direct democracy in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(3), 37-60.
5. Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M., & Katz, R. S. (1999). Party cohesion, party discipline, and parliaments. In Bowler, Farrell, & Katz (Eds.), Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
6. Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., & Florins, M. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cameron, M. A. (1997). Political and economic origins of regime change in Peru: The eighteenth Brumaire of Alberto Fujimori. In M. A. Cameron & P. Mauceri (Eds.), The Peruvian labyrinth: Polity, society, economy (pp. 37-69). University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.
8. Carey, J. M. (in press). Discipline, accountability, and legislative voting in Latin America. Comparative Politics.
9. Cevasco Piedra, J. (2000). El congreso del Perú: Un modelo de modernización [The Peruvian congress: A model of modernization]. Lima: Ediciones del Congreso del Perú.
10. Conaghan, C. (2001, May). Making and unmaking authoritarian Peru: Reelection, resistance, and regime transition. The North-South Agenda, paper 47.
11. Congresistas que votaron y en contra de la revocatoria [Legislators that voted against suspension of immunity]. (2001, May 6). La Gaceta, p. 2.
12. Cox, G. W. (1987). The efficient secret: The cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crisp, B. F., & Rey, J. C. (2001). The sources of electoral reform in Venezuela. In M. S. Shugart & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? (pp. 194-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Desposato, S. (2002). A nonparametric method for inference from cohesion scores. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Diermeier, D., & Feddersen, T. J. (1998). Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 611-622.
16. Diez Canseco, J. (2001, May 6). Impondra el Congreso mano blanda y lucro cesante? [Will Congress apply a light hand?]. La Republica, p. 24.
17. Dion, D. (2001). Turning the legislative thumbscrew: Minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Figueiredo, A. C., & Limongi, F. (2000). Presidential power, legislative organization, and party behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 32(2), 151-170.
19. Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2002, March). A "normal" parliament? Party cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979-2001. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, CA.
20. Huber, J. (1996). The vote of confidence in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 269-282.
21. Mainwaring, S. P., & Scully, T. (Eds.). (1993). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Mauceri, P. (1997). The transition to "democracy" and the failures of institution building. In M. A. Cameron & P. Mauceri (Eds.), The Peruvian labyrinth: Polity, society, economy (pp. 13-36). University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.
23. Mayorga, R. A. (2001). Electoral reform in Bolivia: Origins of the mixed-member proportional system. In M. S. Shugart & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? (pp. 194-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Michnik, A. (2002). The montesinos virus. Social Research, 68(4), 205-219.
25. Morgenstern, S. (2002). Explaining legislative politics in Latin America. In S. Morgenstern & B. Nacif (Eds.), Legislative politics in Latin America (pp. 413-445). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Valenzuela, A. (1994). Party politics and the crisis of presidentialism in Chile: a proposal for a parliamentary form of government. In J. J. Linz & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy: The case of Latin America (Vol. 2; pp. 91-150). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Wright, G. C., & Schaffner, B. F. (2002). The influence of party: Evidence from the state legislatures. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 367-380.