Assessing transboundary environmental impacts on the u.s.–mexican and u.s.–canadian borders

Journal of Borderlands Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 73-96

  Jones, Lilias C ^a   Duncan, Pamela ^b   Mumme, Stephen P ^b  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142228927     PISSN: 08865655     EISSN: 21591229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08865655.1997.9695499     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. August 1983. Agreement Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on Cooperation for the Protection and Improvement of the Environment in the Border Area August, La Paz, Mexico
2. Bevacqua, Frank. 1996. Telephone interview by author with International Joint Commission official (May).
3. Bonneville Power Administration. August 1990. Scoping Meeting Reports, August, Portland: Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
4. Bonneville Power Administration. 1992. Meeting Attendance Registers, Portland: Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
5. Bonneville Power Administration. 1993. Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Delivery of the Canadian Entitlement, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.
6. Bonneville Power Administration. September 1994. SOR Testimony and Meeting Attendance Lists, September, Portland: Bonneville Power Administration.
7. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation. 1994. Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Columbia River System Operation Review, Portland: Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
8. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation. 1995. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Columbia River System Operation Review, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.
9. Bryant, Gary. 1995. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with BOR official (July).
10. Bureau of Reclamation. May 1991. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report: All–American Canal Lining Project, Imperial County, California, May, Washington, D.C.: Department of the Interior.
11. Bureau of Reclamation. March 1994. Final Environmental Impact Statement/Final Environmental Impact Report: All–American Canal Lining Project, Imperial County, California, March, Boulder City: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior.
12. Carter, Jimmy. 1979. “Executive Order 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions.”. Federal Register, 44 (6) 9 January: 1957–60.
13. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board. February 1996. Annual Report: Summary, February, Portland: Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board.
14. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1995. Summary of the Status of Projects, Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
15. 1991. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context. February251991, Espoo, Finland. United Nations. New York
16. Council on Environmental Quality. July 1986. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, July, Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President, U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Day, J.C., Boudreu, Kristan, and Hackett, Nancy C., 1996. “Emerging Institutions for Bilateral Management of the Columbia River Basin.”. American Review of Canadian Studies, 26 Summer: 217–32.
18. Dooley, John. 1995. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with the BOR's SOR Project Director (July).
19. Einert, Martin. 1996. Telephone Interview by Lilias C. Jones with BOR Project Director for Environmental Impact Assessment of the All American Canal Lining Project (February).
20. Ennis, Gordon L., November 1994. “Letter.”. In Final Environmental Impact Statement: Columbia River System Operation Review, Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation November, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.
21. Farrel, David J. 1994. Correspondence with Lilias Jones (23 May).
22. Fox, Roy. 1996. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with Bonneville Power Administration's Federal Hydro Projects Manager (January).
23. Gottlieb, Robert, and FitzSimmons, Margaret. 1991. Thirst for Growth: Water Agencies as Hidden Government in California, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
24. Hayes, Douglas L., 1991. “The All–American Canal Lining Project: A Catalyst for Rational and Comprehensive Groundwater Management on the United States–Mexico Border?”. Transboundary Resources Report, 5 Spring: 1–3.
25. Jaren, Ray. 1995. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with Army Corps of Engineers SOR Project Director (July).
26. Jockel, Joseph T., 1990. “Canada–U.S. Relations in the Bush Era.”. Canadian–American Public Policy, 1 April: 1–28.
27. Konrath, Cathy. 1996. Interview by Pam Duncan with Regional Program Manager, BOR (May).
28. MacLaren, Les. 1996. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with B.C. Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources official (January).
29. Mahant, Edelgard E., and Mount, Graeme S., 1984. An Introduction to Canadian–American Relations, Toronto: Methuen.
30. Matusak, Jan. 1996. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with BOR official (March).
31. McDonald, Dennis. 1996. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with B.C. Environment Ministry Regional Director (January).
32. Mumme, Stephen. 1988. Apportioning Groundwater Beneath the U.S.–Mexico Border, La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.
33. Munton, Don, and Kirton, John. 1994. “North American Environmental Cooperation: Bilateral, Trilateral, Multilateral.”. North American Outlook, 4 March: 59–86.
34. Pfaltzgraff, Robert L., Jr. 1991. “Canada and the United States: Issues for the 1990s.”. In Special Report: Canada and the United States in the 1990s, Washington, D.C.: Macmillan. Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis.
35. Schott, Jeffrey J., 1990. “The Free Trade Agreement: A U.S. Assessment.”. In The Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement: Global Impact, Edited by: Schott, Jeffrey J., and Smith, Murray G., Washington, D.C.: The Institute for International Economics.
36. Sepúlveda, César. 1984. “Los recursos hidráulicos en la zona fronteriza México–Estados Unidos. Perspectiva de la problemática hacia el año 2000—algunas recomendaciones.”. In The U.S.–Mexico Border Region: Anticipating Resource Needs and Issues to the Year 2000, Edited by: Sepúlveda, César, and Utton, Albert E., El Paso: Texas Western Press.
37. Smith, Richard J., and Biniaz, Susan. 1991. “Beyond Dispute: An Air Quality Agreement in the Context of a Consultative Relationship.”. Canada–United States Law Journal, 17: 421–29.
38. Smith, Murray G., 1988. “The Free Trade Agreement in Context: A Canadian Perspective.”. In The Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement: The Global Impact, Edited by: Schott, Jeffrey J., and Smith, Murray G., Washington, D.C.: The Institute for International Economics.
39. Storing, Paul. 1996. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with IBWC Liaison to the U.S. Department of State (March).
40. Streamline. 1995. “Biological Opinions Lead the Way in Operations.”. Streamline: Columbian River System Operating Review Newsletter, 6 June
41. Thor, Phil. 1995. Telephone interview by Pam Duncan with BPA's SOR Project Director (July).
42. Towles, Robert J. 1994. Correspondence to Lilias Jones (22 April).
43. U.S. Department of State. 1988. “U.S.–Canada Relations.”. Department of State Bulletin, 88 (2136): 23–24.
44. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Facts About the National Environmental Policy Act, Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
45. U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. 1989. Lining the All–American Canal: Oversight Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46. Utton, Albert E., 1982. “An Assessment of the Management of U.S.–Mexican Water Resources: Anticipating the Year 2000.”. In The U.S.– Mexico Border Region: Anticipating Resource Needs and Issues to the Year 2000, Edited by: Sepúlveda, César, and Utton, Albert E., El Paso: Texas Western Press.
47. Utton, Albert E., 1991. “The Transfer of Water from an International Border Region: A Tale of Six Cities and the All American Canal.”. North Carolina Journal of International Law, 16 Fall: 477–95.
48. Waller, Thomas. 1992. “Southern California Water Politics and U.S.–Mexican Relations: Lining the All–American Canal.”. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 7 Fall: 1–32.
49. Weiman, Deanna. October 1991. EPA Comments: Bureau of Reclamation: All–American Canal Lining Project/DEIS October, Imperial County, California
50. Weintraub, Sidney. 1994. “Current State of U.S.–Canada Economic Relations.”. American Review of Canadian Studies, 24 Winter: 473–88.
51. Wilson, James Q., ed. 1980. The Politics of Regulation, New York: Basic Books, Inc.
52. Yale, Carolyn. 1996. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with EPA Region IX official (February).
53. Yates, Edward. 1996. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with BOR official (February).
54. Ybarra, Robert. 1995. Telephone interview by Lilias Jones with the Secretary, U.S. Section, IBWC (December).