Investigation of different stakeholder views of local resident involvement during environmental impact assessments in the UK

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-82

  Robinson, Michael ^a   Bond, Alan ^b  

^a BLACK AND VEATCH   (United States)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EIA; Local resident involvement; Public involvement; Stakeholder views

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; STAKEHOLDER;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0142228705     PISSN: 14643332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1464333203001267     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arnstein, S.R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-244.
2. Barrow, C.J. (1997) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. London: Arnold
3. Boyle, J. (1998) Cultural influences on implementing EIA: Insights from Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(2), 95-116
4. Burdge, R.J. (1995) Getting and staying in touch: Sociological techniques for evaluation of range management decision alternatives. In A Conceptual Approach to Social Impact Assessment, ed. R.J. Burdge. Middleton, Wisconsin: Social Ecology Press
5. Canter, L.W. (1996) Environmental Impact Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill
6. Charest, P. (1995) Aboriginal alternatives to megaprojects. Impact Assessment, 13(4), 371-386
7. Commission of the European Communities (2001) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities: 1-25
8. Council of the European Communities (1985) Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities, C175, 40-49
9. Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities, 40(L73), 5-14
10. Department of the Environment Planning Research Programme (1996) Changes in the quality of environmental statements for planning projects. London: HMSO
11. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (1998a) Environmental Assessment: Environmental Assessment in the United Kingdom. [Online] Accessed from: http://www.planning.detr.gov.uk/eia/assess/doc02.htm [Last accessed 21 June 2000]
12. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (1998b) Environmental assessment: Public participation. [Online] Accessed from: http://www.planning.detr.gov.uk/eia/assess/doc10.htm [Last accessed 21 June 2000]
13. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (2000) Public participation in making local environmental decisions. The Aarhus Convention Newcastle workshop: Good practice handbook. London: DETR
14. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions/National Assembly for Wales (2000) Environmental Impact Assessment. A Guide to Procedures. Tonbridge: Thomas Telford Ltd
15. ENDS (1997) European Court extends scope of environmental assessment rules. The ENDS Report, 264, 44-45
16. ENDS (2000) Environmental consultancy directory: Advanced Search. [Online] Accessed from: http://www.ends.co.uk/consultants/index.htm [Last accessed 24 June 2000]
17. Fu-Keung Ip, D. (1990) Difficulties in implementing social impact assessment in China: Methodological considerations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 10, 113-122
18. Glasson, J., Therivel, R. & Chadwick, A. (1999) Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Principles and Procedures, Process, Practice and Prospects. London: UCL Press
19. Gloucestershire County Council (2000) Census Statistics. Gloucester, Gloucestershire County Council
20. Grady, K. (1996) Public participation in environmental assessment. EIA Newsletter, 12, 4-5
21. Hickie, D. & Wade, M. (1998) Development guidelines for improving the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(3), 267-287
22. Htun, H. (1988) The EIA process in Asia and the Pacific region. In Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice, ed. P. Wathern. London: Unwin Hyman
23. Institute of Environmental Assessment (1999) Participation in environmental decision-making (Consultation Draft) [Online]. [Online] Accessed from: http://www.greenchannel.com/iea/Web%20Public/particip.htm [Last accessed 16th September 1999]
24. Matthews, H. & Foster, I. (1989) Geographical Data: Sources, Presentation and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press
25. Md-Taha, R. (1999) Public perception of road traffic noise barriers - UK and Malaysian perspectives. Institute of Biological Sciences. Aberystwyth: University of Wales, Aberystwyth
26. Muntemba, S. (1996) Public participation in environmental assessment for Bank-supported projects in Sub-Saharan Afri. In Environmental Assessment (EA) in Africa: A World Bank Commitment, eds. R. Goodland, J.R. Mercier & S. Muntemba. The World Bank
27. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1991) 1991 Census Small Area Statistics - 100%. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys
28. Palerm, J.R. (1999) Public participation in EIA in Hungary: Analysis through three case studies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, 201-220
29. Palerm, J.R. (2000) An empirical-theoretical analysis framework for public participation in environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(5), 581-600
30. Petts, J. (1999) Public participation and environmental impact assessment. In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment - Vol. 1 Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential, ed. J. Petts, Oxford: Blackwell Science
31. Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. (2003) Public Perceptions of Risk, Science and Governance, p. 61. Norwich: Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia
32. Roberts, R. (1996) Public involvement: From consultation to participation. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, eds. F. Vanclay & D.A. Bronstein. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
33. Sheate, W. (1996) NGO participation in EIA. EIA Newsletter, 12, 7-8
34. Sinclair, J. & Diduck, A. (1995) Public education: An undervalued component of the environmental assessment public involvement process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(3), 219-240
35. Spooner, B. (1998) Review of the quality of EIA guidelines, their use and circumnavigation. In A Directory of Impact Assessment Guidelines, 2nd Ed., eds. A. Donnelly, B. Dalal-Clayton & R. Hughes. London: International Institute for Environmental and Development
36. Sullivan, W.C., Kuo, F.E. & Probhu, M. (1996) Assessing the impact of environmental impact statements on citizens. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(3), 171-182
37. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, p. 28. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Environmental Policy
38. Wood, C. & Jones, C. (1991) Monitoring Environmental Assessment and Planning. London: HMSO
39. Zeiss, C. (1991) Community decision-making and impact management priorities for siting waste facilities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 231-255