Reliability Evaluation in Seismic Design: A Response Surface Methodology

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 579-603

  Möller, Oscar ^a   Foschi, Ricardo O ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PROBABILITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WATER TANKS;

GROUND MOTION;

SEISMOLOGY;

CALIBRATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GROUND MOTION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 0142219896     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1598200     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bucher, C. G., and Bourgund, U., 1990. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems, Structural Safety 7 (1), 57-66.
2. Clough, R. W., Benuska, K. L., and Wilson, E. L., 1965. Inelastic earthquake response of tall buildings, Proceedings, Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Vol. II, pp. 68-69, New Zealand National Committee on Earthquake Engineering.
3. Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J., 1975. Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Cornell, C. A., 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 1583-1606.
5. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., and Ramasco, R., 1993. The use of damage functional in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 22, 855-868.
6. Ditlevsen, O., 1979. Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems, J. Struct. Mech. 7 (4), 453-472.
7. Eligehausen, R., Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V., 1983. Local bond stress-slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations, Report No. EERC 83-23, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
8. Faravelli, L., 1989. Response surface approach for reliability analysis, J. Eng. Mech. 115, 2763-2781.
9. Filippou, F. C., and Issa, A., 1988. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frames under cyclic load reversals, Report No. EERC 88-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
10. Filippou, F. C., D'Ambrisi, A., and Issa, A., 1992. Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete subassemblages, Report No. EERC 92-08, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
11. Giberson, M. F., 1967. The Response of Nonlinear Multi-story Structures Subjected to Earthquake Excitations, Ph.D. Thesis, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
12. Giberson, M., 1969. Two nonlinear beams with definition of ductility, ASCE J. Struct. Div. 65 (ST2), 137-157.
13. INPRES, 1995. Microzonificación sísmica del Gran Mendoza, Publicación Técnica N° 19, Instituto Nacional de Prevención Sísmica, in Spanish.
14. Kim, S.-H., and Na, S.-W., 1997. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points, Structural Safety 19, 3-19.
15. Krawinkler, H., 1997. Research issues in performance based seismic engineering, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Fajfar & Krawinkler (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam.
16. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R., 1984. Seismic design of bridge piers, Research Report 84-2, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
17. Melchers, R. E., 1987. Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction, Edition Ellis Horwood Limited, Halsted Press, a division of John Wiley & Sons.
18. Möller, O., 1995. Modelo constitutivo para nudos de hormigón armado sismorresistentes, con deslizamiento de armaduras, Mecánica Computacional, edited by A. Larretegury and M. Vénere, AMCA, Vol. XV, pp. 13-22, in Spanish.
19. Möller, O., 2001. Metodología para evaluación de la probabilidad de falla de estructuras sismorresistentes y calibración de códigos, Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina, in Spanish.
20. Otani, S., 1974. Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures, J. Struct. Div. ASCE 100 (ST7), 1433-1449.
21. Park, Y. J., and Ang, A. H-S., 1985. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete, J. Struct. Eng. 111 (ST4), 722-739.
22. Rajashekhar, M. R., and Ellingwood, B. R., 1993. A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis, Structural Safety 12, 205-220.
23. SEAOC, 1995. Vision 2000, Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
24. Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C., and Taucer, F. F., 1996. Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: Part I. Formulation and Part II. Applications, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (7), 711-742.
25. Wong, F. S., 1984. Uncertainties in dynamic soil-structure interaction, J. Eng. Mech. 110, 308-324.
26. Wong, F. S., 1985. Slope reliability and response surface method, J. Geotech. Eng. 111, 32-53.