Fatigue compensation during FES using surface EMG

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 555-568

  Winslow, Jeffrey ^a   Jacobs, Patrick L ^b,c   Tepavac, Dejan ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; FES; Muscle fatigue

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELBOW; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT MOBILITY; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; MUSCLE EXCITATION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; TRAINING;

EID: 0142217962     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00055-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abbas J., Triolo R. Experimental evaluation of an adaptive feedforward controller for use in functional neuromuscular stimulation systems. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 5:1997;12-22.
2. Basmajian J., De Luca C. Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. fifth edition:1985;Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. pp. 203-204.
3. Cheron G., Draye J., Bourgeios M., Libert G. A dynamic neural network identification of electromyography and arm trajectory relationship during complex movements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 43:1996;552-558.
4. Graupe D., Kohn K.H., Basseas S. Above- and below-lesion EMG pattern mapping for controlling electrical stimulation of paraplegics to facilitate unbraced walker-assisted walking. J Biomed Eng. 10:1988;305-311.
5. Graupe D., Kordylewski H. Artificial neural network control of FES in paraplegics for patient responsive ambulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 42:1995;699-707.
6. Hambrecht F.T. A brief history of neural prostheses. Stein R., Peckham P., Popovic D. Neural Prostheses: Replacing Motor Function After Disease or Disability. 1992;9 Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. second edition:1999;Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey. pp. 206-208.
8. ® I Ambulation System: Part I Ambulation System: Part 1. Ambulation performance and anthropometric measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78:1997;789-792.
9. E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz, T.M. Jessell, Principles of Neural Science,fourth edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapter 36, (2000) p. 731.
10. Lan N., Feng H., Crago P.E. Neural network generation of muscle stimulation patterns for control of arm movements. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2:1994;213-223.
11. Mizrahi J., Levy M., Ring H., Isakov E., Liberson A. EMG as an indicator of fatigue in isometrically FES-activated paralyzed muscles. IEEE Trans Rehabil Engg. 2:1994;57-65.
12. Principe J.C., Lefebvre W.C., Euliano N.R. Neural and adaptive systems: fundamentals through simulations. 2000;John Wiley and Sons, New York. pgs. 119, 514.
13. Prochazka A. Comparison of natural and artificial control of movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1:1993;7-16.
14. Tepavac D., Schwirtlich L. Detection and prediction of FES-induced fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 7:1997;39-50.
15. Tepavac D., Medri E. Force estimation using surface EMG in FES systems. J Aut Control. 4:1994;17-29.
16. J. Winslow, Fatigue compensation during FES using surface EMG. Master's thesis, University of Miami, 2001. Unpublished.
17. Yang J.F., Winter D.A. Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 64:1983;417-420.