Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: Penoscrotal vs infrapubic

International Journal of Impotence Research

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2003, Pages

  Montague, D K ^a   Angermeir, K W ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Penile implantation; Penile prosthesis

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INCISION; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; NERVE INJURY; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMPLANTATION; SENSORY NERVE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

HUMANS; MALE; PENILE IMPLANTATION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PENIS; SCROTUM;

EID: 0142215451     PISSN: 09559930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901089     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence: use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1973; 2: 80.
2. Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology 1975; 5: 479.
3. Baum N, Suarez G, Mobley D. Use of infrapubic incision for insertion of Mentor Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1992; 39: 436.
4. Graydon RJ, Berlin BB. Improved pump placement with infrapubic penile prosthetic implantation. J Urol 1992; 148: 102.
5. Scarzella GI. Improved technique for implanting AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis using transverse scrotal approach. Urology 1989; 34: 388.
6. Garber BB, Marcus SM. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection? Urology 1998; 52: 291.