Non-rigid registration of mammograms obtained with variable breast compression: A phantom study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2717, Issue , 2003, Pages 281-290

  Richard, Frédéric J P ^a   Bakić, Predrag R ^b   Maidment, Andrew D A ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast compression; Finite elements; Image registration; Mammogram synthesis; Mammography; Multigrid optimization; Multimodality registration; Partial differential equations; Tissue modeling

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TISSUE; X RAY SCREENS;

ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS; BREAST ABNORMALITIES; MULTI-MODALITY REGISTRATION; MULTIGRID OPTIMIZATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; REGISTRATION ALGORITHMS; TISSUE MODELING;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 0142214588     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39701-4_30     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J. Maintz and M.A. Viergever. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis, 2(1):1-36, 1998.
2. U. Grenander and M.I. Miller. Computational Anatomy: an emerging discipline. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 56(4):617-694, December 1998.
3. A. Toga. Brain mapping. Academic Press, 1999.
4. F. Richard and L. Cohen. A new image registration technique with free boundary constraints: application to mammography. In A. Heyden et al., editor, Proc. ECCV, volume 4, pages 531-545, Copenhaguen, Denmark, may 2002. Springer.
5. F. Richard and L. Cohen. Non-rigid image registration with free boundary constraints: application to mammography. Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Special issue on Nonrigid registration, 89(2-3):166-196, 2003.
6. F. Richard and C. Graffigne. An image-matching model for the registration of temporal or bilateral mammogram pairs. In M. Yaffe, editor, Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 756-762, Toronto, Canada, June 2000. Medical Physics.
7. M.Y. Sallam and K. Bowyer. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images. Medical Image Analysis, 3(2):103-118, 1999.
8. J.L. Semmlow, A. Shadagopappan, L.V. Ackerman, et al. A fully automated system for screening Xeromammograms. Computers and Biomedical Research, 13:350-362, 1980.
9. R.P. Highnam and J.M. Brady. Mammographic image analysis. Kluwer series in Medical Imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; Boston, March 1999.
10. R. Novak. Transformation of the female breast during compression at mammography with special reference to importance for localization of a lesion, PhD thesis, Departement of Diagnostic Radiology at Lakarhuset and Karolinska Sjukhuset, Sweden, 1989.
11. P. Bakic, D. Brzakovic, P. Brzakovic, et al. An approach to using a generalized breast model to segment digital mammograms. In Proc. of 11th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pages 84-89, Lubbock, 1998.
12. P. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. Maidment. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation, i. breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Medical Physics, 29(9):2131-2139, 2002.
13. P. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. Maidment. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation, ii. evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. Medical Physics, 29(9):2140-2151, 2002.
14. F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, et al. Multi-modality volume registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 16(2):187-198, 1997.
15. P. Viola and W. Wells. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Intern. J. of Comp. Vision, 24(2):137-154, 1997.
16. Y. Amit. A non-linear variational problem for image matching. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 15(1):207-224, January 1994.
17. R. Bajcsy and S. Kovacic. Multiresolution elastic matching. CVGIP, 46:1-21, 1989.
18. G.E. Christensen, R.D. Rabbitt, and M.I. Miller. Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, volume 90, pages 11944-11948, dec 93.
19. P. Bakic, M. Albert, and A. Maidment. Classification of galactograms using ramification matrices: preliminary results. Academic Radiology, 10(2):198-204, 2003.
20. R. Hunt, D. Dance, P. Bakic, et al. Monte carlo simulation of x-ray mammography using a realistic voxel phantom. In Proc. of UK Radiological Congress, Birmingham, UK, 2003.
21. G. Kossoff, E.K. Fry, and J. Jellins. Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 53:1730-1736, 1973.
22. ACR Committee on Quality Assurance in Mammography. Mammography Quality Control Manual. Amercan College of radiology, Reston, VA, 1999.
23. D. Sullivan, C. Beam, S. Goodman, and D. Watt. Measurement of force applied during mammography. Radiology, 181:355-357, 1991.