Sliding singlet mechanism reexamined

Physical Review D

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  Maekawa, Nobuhiro ^a   Yamashita, Toshifumi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICITY; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; MASS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICS;

EID: 0142213602     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.055001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 105B, 267 (1981);
2. D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, ibid. 113B, 151 (1982).
3. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 117B, 287 (1982);
4. K. Tabata, I. Umemura, and K. Yamamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 615 (1984);
5. A. Sen, Phys. Lett. 148B, 65 (1984).
6. S.M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 57, 190 (1998).
7. G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 324, 59 (1994).
8. H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 108B, 283 (1982);
9. A. Masiero, D.V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett., ibid. 115B, 380 (1982);
10. B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B206, 387 (1982).
11. S.M. Barr, Phys. Lett. 112B, 219 (1982);
12. I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 194, 231 (1987);
13. I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 205, 459 (1988).
14. S. Dimopoulos and F. Wilczek, NSF-ITP-82-07;
15. M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B202, 327 (1982).
16. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, and T. Takano, Prog. Theor. Phys. 75, 664 (1986);
17. A. Anselm and A. Johansen, Phys. Lett. B 200, 331 (1988);
18. A. Anselm, Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 663 (1988);
19. Z.G. Berezhiani and G. Dvali, Sov. Phys. Lebedev. Inst. Rep. 5, 55 (1989);
20. Z.G. Berezhiani, C. Csaki, and L. Randall, Nucl. Phys. B44, 61 (1995);
21. M. Bando and T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 109, 87 (2003).
22. Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 613 (2000);
23. Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 691 (2001);
24. Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 999 (2001).
25. J. Polchinski and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 26, 3661 (1982);
26. H.P. Nilles, M. Srednicki, and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. 124B, 237 (1982);
27. A.B. Lahanas, Phys. Lett., ibid. 124B, 341 (1982).
28. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 149B, 351 (1984);
29. M. Dine, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B289, 589 (1987);
30. J.J. Atick, L.J. Dixon, and A. Sen, Nucl. Phys., ibid. B292, 109 (1987);
31. M. Dine, I. Ichinose, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys., ibid. B293, 253 (1987).
32. M. Green and J. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984).
33. N. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 597 (2002);
34. N. Maekawa and T. Yamashita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 121801 (2003);
35. Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 719 (2002).
36. M. Bando and M. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106, 1255 (2001).
37. N. Maekawa, Phys. Lett. B 561, 273 (2003).
38. N. Maekawa and T. Yamashita, hep-ex/0303207.
39. N. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106, 401 (2001); hep-ph/0110276;
40. N. Maekawa and T. Yamashita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 1201 (2002).
41. N. Maekawa, Phys. Lett. B 521, 42 (2001).
42. C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147, 277 (1979).
43. N. Maekawa and T. Yamashita, hep-ph/0304293;
44. J. Harada, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 011 (2003).
45. S.M. Barr and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4748 (1997).
46. SB.
47. 2 are absent at the tree level, this problem cannot be avoided.
48. i′, are needed.
49. 0 as Q, U, D, L, E, N, X, G, and W, respectively, and the conjugate representation of a representation R is denoted by R̄.
50. See Ref. [16] and its references [14, 17, 18].
51. 6 model.
52. 2C′, one linear combination of the two L of C has a non-vanishing mass parameter.
53. Conversely, components with different charges from the SM singlet component become massive, as has been used to make pseudo Nambu-Goldstone modes massive in the literature [21].