Scientific integrity

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 197-198

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NURSING; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0142186808     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-6554(03)00137-4     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Ben-Yehuda N. Deviance in science. Br J Criminology. 26:1986;1-27.
2. Weed D. Preventing scientific misconduct. Am J Public Health. 88:1998;125-129.
3. Denham S.A. Stemming the tide of disreputable science Implications for nursing . Nurs Forum. 28:1993;11-18.
4. Carlson, DK. Gallup Poll Analyses-Nurses Remain at Top of Honesty and Ethics Poll. Gallup News Service 2000. The Gallup Organization Web site. 2000. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/subscription/?m=f&c id=9961. Accessed May 30, 2003.
5. Analysis of Institutional Policies for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Office for Research Integrity Web site. 2000. Available at: http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/html/programs/polanal2.asp. Accessed on June 1, 2003.
6. Ketefian S., Knafl K., Pinch R. Guidelines for scientific integrity. 1995;Midwest Nursing Research Society, Glenview, IL.
7. Rankin M., Esteves M. Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing. Nursing Research, 46, 5, 270-276. 1997;Midwest Nursing Research Society, Glenview, IL.
8. LaFollette M. Research misconduct. Society. 2:1994;6-10.
9. Broome M. Scientific integrity The cornerstone of knowledge . J Neurosci Nurs. 35:2003;56-59.