Quality of life assessment for chronic stable angina

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 637-650

  Kim, Catherine ^a   Bernstein, Steven J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Angina; Angioplasty; Bypass; Health status; Instruments; Myocardial infarction; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Utility

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 0142186144     PISSN: 14737167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.3.5.637     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. PharmacoEconomic 17(1), 13-35 (2000).
2. Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, Spertus JA. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J. Clin. Epidmiol. 51(7), 569-575 (1998).
3. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 2(6), 369-395 (1993).
4. Gandjour A, Lauterbach K. Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris. PharmacoEconomics 16(2), 141-152 (1999).
5. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med. Care. 38(Suppl. 9), II138-II150 (2000).
6. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41 (1), 159-168 (2003).
7. Pilote L, Lauzon C, Huynh T et al. Quality of life after acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at sites with and without on-site availability of angiography. Arch. Intern. Med. 162(5), 553-559 (2002).
8. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L. Quality of life of chronic stable angina patients 4 years after coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Intern. Med. 249, 47-57 (2001).
9. Brorsson B, Ifver J, Hays RD. The Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL). Qual. Life Res. 2, 33-45 (1993).
10. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L. Quality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and four years after coronary revascularisation compared with a normal population. Heart 87, 140-145 (2002).
11. Visser MC, Fletcher AE, Part G, Simpson A, Bulpitt CJ. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: the Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile and the Quality of Well-Being Scale. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 47(2), 157-163 (1994).
12. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEven J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc. Sci. Med. 15A, 221-229 (1981).
13. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J. Epidemiol. Com. Health 34(4), 281-286 (1980).
14. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract. 35(273), 185-188 (1985).
15. de Bruin AF, de Witte LP, Stevens F, Diederiks JP. Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Soc. Sci. Med. 35(8), 1003-1014 (1992).
16. Kaplan RM, Ganiats TG, Sieber WJ, Anderson JP. The quality of well-being scale: critical similarities and differences with SF-36. Int. J. Qual. Healthcare 10(6), 509-520 (1998).
17. Dixon T, Lim LLY, Oldridge NB. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: reference data for users. Qual. Life Res. 11, 173-183 (2002).
18. Valenti L, Lim LLY, Heller RF, Knapp J. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. Qual. Life Res. 5 (1), 151-161 (1996).
19. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst T et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 25, 333-341 (1995).
20. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation 64, 1227-1234 (1981).
21. Spertus JA, Dewhurst T, Dougherty CM, Nichol P. Testing the effectiveness of converting patients to long-acting anti-anginal medications: the Quality of Life in Angina Research Trial (QUART). Am. Heart J. 141, 550-558 (2001).
22. Spertus JA. Selecting end points in clinical trials: what evidence do we really need to evaluate a new treatment? Am. Heart J. 142, 745-747 (2001).
23. Spertus JA, Dewhurt TA, Dougherty CM et al. Benefits of an angina clinic for patients with coronary artery disease: a demonstration of health status markers of healthcare quality. Am. Heart J. 143, 145-150 (2002).
24. Prutkin JM, Feinstein AR. Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis. Yale J. Biol. Med. 75(2), 79-93 (2002).
25. Chen AY, Daley J, Thibault GE. Angina patients rating of current health and health without angina. Med. Decis. Making 16 169-177 (1996).
26. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D et al. Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population. Heart 81, 352-358 (1999).
27. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med. Care. 26, 724-735 (1988).
28. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr. Construction and validation of an alternate form general mental health scale for the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey. Med. Care. 33(1), 15-28 (1995).
29. Bengtsson I, Hagman M, Wedel H. Age and angina as predictors of quality of life after myocardial infarction: a prospective comparative study. Scan. Cardiovasc. J. 35, 252-258 (2001).
30. Thompson DR, Jenkinson C, Roebuck A, Lewin RJP, Boyle RM, Chandola T. Development and validation of a short measure of health status for individuals with acute myocardial infarction: The Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). Qual. Life. Res. 11, 535-543 (2002).
31. Tsevat J, Goldman L, Lamas GA et al. Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction. Med. Care. 29(11), 1153-1159 (1991).
32. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioecon. Plan. Sci. 10, 129 (1976).
33. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. Br. Med. J. 316(7133), 736-741 (1998).
34. Beck CA, Joseph L, Belisle P, Pilote L. Predictors of quality of life 6 months and 1 year after myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 142(2), 271-279 (2001).
35. Bradley CJ, Kroll J, Holmes-Rovner M. The health and activities limitation index in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 53(6), 555-562 (2000).
36. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, Treasure T, Hampton JR. Quality of life, employment status and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery: 3 year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation 94(2), 135-142 (1996).
37. Wahrborg P. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 1-year follow-up in the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization Investigation (CABRI) trial. Eur. Heart J. 20, 653-658 (1999).
38. Borkon AM, Muehlebach GF, House J, Marso SP, Spertus JA. A comparison of the recovery of health status after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 749 1526-1530 (2002).
39. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Clayton T, Lyman GH, Chamberlain DA, RITA-2 Trial Participants. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: 3-year follow-up in the RITA-2 Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 35(4), 907-914 (2000).
40. Strauss WE, Fortin T, Hartigan P, Folland ED, Parisi AF. A comparison of quality of life scores in patients with angina pectoris after angioplasty compared with after medical therapy. Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Circulation 92, 1710-1719 (1995).
41. Dupuy H. The Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index. In: Assessment of Quality of life in Clinical Trial of Cardiovascular Therapies. Wenger N, Mattson M, Furberg C, Elinson J (Eds). Le Jacq Publishers Inc., CT, USA, 170-183 (1984).
42. Folland ED, Hartigan PM, Parisi AF, for the Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina pectoris. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 29(7), 1505-1511 (1997).
43. Cobb LA, Thomas GI, Dillard DH, Merendino KA, Bruce RA. An evaluation of internal mammary artery ligation by a double-blind technique. N. Engl. J. Med. 260, 1115-1118 (1959).
44. Bliley AV, Ferrans CE. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty. Heart Lung 22(3), 193-199 (1993).
45. Caine N, Harrison SCW, Sharples LD, Wallwork J. Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Bri. Med. J. 302, 511-516 (1991).
46. Sjoland H, Caidahl K, Wiklund I et al. Impact of coronary artery bypass grafting on various aspects of quality of life. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg. 12, 617-619 (1997).
47. Klersy C, Collarini L, Morellini MC, Cellino F. Heart surgery and quality of life: a prospective study on ischemic patients. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg. 12, 602-609 (1997).
48. Sjoland H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Haglid M, Westberg S, Herlitz J. Improvement in quality of life and exercise capacity after coronary bypass surgery. Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 265-271 (1996).
49. Wilson A, Wiklund I, Lahti T, Wahl M. A summary index for the assessment of quality of life in angina pectoris. J. Clin. Epidemiol, 44, 981-988 (1991).
50. Skaggs B, Yates BC. Quality of life comparisons after coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung 28(6), 409-417 (1999).
51. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 8(1), 15-24 (1985).
52. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Psychometric assessment of the quality of life index. Res. Nursing Health 15, 29-38 (1992).
53. Nash IS, Curtis LH, Rubin H. Predictors of patient-reported physical and mental health 6 months after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Am. Heart J. 138(3), 422-429 (1999).
54. Cleary PD, Epstein AM, Oster G et al. Health-related quality of life among patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Med. Care. 29(10), 939-949 (1991).
55. Cleary PD, Greenfield S, McNeil BJ. Assessing quality of life after surgery. Control Clin. Trials. 12, S189-S203 (1991).
56. Verrill DE, Barton C, Beasley W, Lippard M, King CN. Six-minute walk performance and quality of life comparisons in North Carolina cardiac rehabilitation programs. Heart Lung 32(1), 41-51 (2003).
57. Verrill DE, Barton C, Beasley W, Brennan M, Lippard M, King CN. Quality of life measures and gender comparisons in North Carolina Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. J. Cardiopulmonary Rehabil. 21, 37-46 (2001).
58. Herlitz J, Wiklund I, Caidahl K et al. Determinants of an impaired quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart 81, 342-346 (1999).
59. Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among women with coronary artery disease. Heart Lung 27(3), 189-199 (1998).
60. Sjoland H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Hartford M, Karlsson T, Herlitz J. Improvement in quality of life differs between women and men after coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Intern. Med. 245, 445-454 (1999).
61. Kimble LP, McGuire DB, Dunbar SB et al. Gender differences in pain characteristics of chronic stable angina and perceived physical limitation in patients with coronary artery disease. Pain 101 (102), 45-53 (2003).
62. Chambers LW. The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire. In: Assessment of Quality of Life. Wenger N (Ed.). Le Jacq, NY, USA (1984).
63. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. The Health Institute, Boston, MA, USA (1994).
64. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med. Care. 32(1), 40-66 (1994).
65. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med. Care. 31(3), 247-263(1993).
66. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the Index of Well-Being. Health Serv. Res. 11, 478-507 (1976).
67. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med. Care. 14(1), 57-67 (1976).
68. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med. Care. 19(8), 787-805 (1981).
69. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16, 199-208 (1990).
70. Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the EuroQol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual. Life Res. 2(3), 169-180 (1993).