Double-contrast MR colonography: In vivo experimental study in an animal model

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2003, Pages

  Boraschi, Piero ^a   Neri, Emanuele ^b   Vannucci, Luca ^b   Vagli, Paola ^b   Braccini, Giovanni ^a   Bartolozzi, Carlo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Colon; Diagnosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging rat; MR colon neoplasms; Neoplasms colon

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLON RADIOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOUBLE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; DOUBLE CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; RAT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 0142184229     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Potter JD, Slattery MJ., Bostick RM et al: Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev, 1993; 15: 499-545
2. Silverberg E, Boring CC, Squires TS: Cancer statistics, 1990. CA Cancer J Clin, 1990; 40: 9-26, 318-9
3. Rudy DR, Zdon MJ: Update on colorectal cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 61: 1759-70, 1773-4
4. Chapuis PH, Fisher R, Dent OF et al: The relationship between different staging methods and survival in colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum, 1985; 28: 158-61
5. Gore RM: Colorectal cancer. Clinical and pathologic features. Radiol Clin North Am, 1997; 35: 403-29
6. Thoeni RF: Colorectal cancer. Radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am, 1997; 35: 457-85
7. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P et al: Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology, 1998; 207: 59-65
8. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S et al: Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology, 2000; 216: 383-8
9. Wallengren NO, Holtas S, Andren-Sandberg A et al: Rectal carcinoma: double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging. Radiology, 2000; 215: 108-14
10. Maier AG, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Reeders JW et al: Staging of rectal cancer by double-contrast MR imaging using the rectally administered superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent ferristene and IV gadodiamide injection: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000; 12: 651-60
11. Vannucci L, Huggins CB, Mosca F: A new experimental model for colorectal carcinogenesis in the rat. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol, 1994; 13: 59-61
12. Levin B, Raijman I: Malignant tumors of the colon and rectum. In: Haubbrich WS, Schaffner F, eds. Bockus Gastroenterology, ed 5. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995: 1744-72
13. Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA et al: Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: patterns of failure and survival. J Clin Oncol, 1988; 6: 106-18
14. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE et al: Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. Radiology, 1996; 200:49-54
15. Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT: Virtual colonoscopy: what will the issues be? AJR, 1997; 169: 453-8
16. Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD et al: CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR, 1997; 169: 1237-42
17. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al: Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology, 2000; 216: 704-11
18. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J et al: Diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut, 2000; 47: 126-30
19. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L et al: Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology, 2002; 223: 615-9
20. Fletcher JG, Luboldt W: CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison. Eur Radiol, 2000; 10: 786-801
21. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S et al: Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999; 9: 745-50
22. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D et al: MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR, 2001; 177: 823-7
23. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG et al: MR colonography with barium-based fetal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology, 2002; 223: 248-54
24. Chou CK, Lin GC, Chen LT et al: The use of MRI in bowel obstruction. Abdom Imaging, 1993; 18: 131-5
25. 3He as an endoluminal contrast agent: demonstration of feasibility. Magn Reson Med, 2000; 44: 813-6
26. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ et al: MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR, 2001; 176: 144-6
27. 2 enema - pilot study. Radiology, 2001; 219: 558-62
28. Wojczys R, Bednarz W, Szydłowski Z: Primary anastomosis in experimental left colonic obstruction in rats. Med Sci Monit, 1996; 2: 707-9
29. Vavrik J, Foltynowa V, Vitkova I et al: Changes in abdominal wall after mesh implantation in rats. Med Sci Monit, 2000; 6: 476-9
30. Miyazawa T, Matsumoto M, Kato S et al: Dopamine-induced protection against indomethacin-evoked intestinal lesions in rats - role of anti-intestinal motility mediated by D2 receptors. Med Sci Monit, 2003; 9: BR71-7