The visual sort and rate method for perceptual evaluation in listening tests

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 109-116

  Granqvist, Svante ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Listening test; Perception (voice); Reliability; VAS; VISOR; Voice quality; VSR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HEARING; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING TEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINGUISTICS; PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SPEECH; VISION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0142180001     PISSN: 14015439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14015430310015255     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berliner JE, Durlach NI, Braida LD. Intensity perception. IX. Effect of a fixed standard on resolution in identification. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 687-9.
2. Gauffin J, Granqvist S, Hammarberg B, Hertegård S, Håkansson A. Irregularities in the voice, some perceptual experiments using synthetic voices. Proc of XIII Intl Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS95), Stockholm, 1995;2:242-5.
3. Gerratt B, Kreimann J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, Berke G. Comparing Internal and External Standards in Voice Quality Judgements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 14-20.
4. Granqvist S. Addsynt, an additive voice synthesiser for PC. Quarterly Progress and Status Report, Dept. of Speech Music and Hearing, KTH, Stockholm, TMH-QPSR 4/1996: 57-60. http://www.speech.kth.se/qpsr/tmh/
5. Hammarberg B. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia. Stockholm: Dissertation. Dept of Logopedics and phoniatrics, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, 1986.
6. Holmberg EB, Hillman RE, Hammarberg B, Södersten M, Doyle P. Efficacy of a behaviorally-based voice therapy protocol for vocal nodules. J Voice 2001; 15: 395-412.
7. House D. "Rise alignment in the perception of focal accent and pitch in Swedish" Proc Fonetik 2000, Skövde, Sweden 2000. p. 73-6.
8. Isshiki N, Okamura H, Tanabe M, Morimoto M. Differential Diagnosis of Hoarseness. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1969; 21: 9-19.
9. Kreiman J, Gerratt B. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality: Review, Tutorial, and a Framework for Future Research. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 21-40.
10. McAllister A, Sederholm E, Ternström S, Sundberg J. Perturbation and Hoarseness: A Pilot Study of Six Children's voices. J Voice 1995; 10: 252-61.
11. McAllister A, Sundberg J, Hibi S. Acoustic measurements and perceptual evaluation of hoarseness in children's voices. Quarterly Progress and Status Report, Dept. of Speech Music and Hearing, KTH, Stockholm, Quarterly Progress and Status Report, Dept. of Speech Music and Hearing, KTH, Stockholm, TMH-QPSR 4/1996: 15-26. http://www.speech.kth.se/qpsr/tmh/
12. Rabinov R, Kreiman J, Gerratt B, Bielamowicz S. Comparing Reliability of Perceptual Ratings of Roughness and Acoustic Measures of Jitter. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 26-32.
13. Sederholm E, McAllister A, Sundberg J, Dalkvist J. Perceptual analysis of child hoarseness using continuous scales. Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 1993; 18: 73-82.
14. Titze I. Definitions and Nomenclature Related to Voice Quality. Vocal Fold Physiology, Voice Quality Control. San Diego: Calif. Singular Publishing Group; 1994. pp. 335-42.
15. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 227-36.