ILLUSIONS AND ISSUES IN BIMODAL SPEECH PERCEPTION

Auditory-Visual Speech Processing 1998, AVSP 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 21-26

  Massaro, Dominic W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING;

AUDITORY-VISUAL; COTTAGE INDUSTRIES; DYNAMIC INFORMATION; MCGURK EFFECT; NEURAL-PROCESSING; RESEARCH AND APPLICATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME COURSE; VISUAL SPEECH; VISUAL-PROCESSING;

VISUAL LANGUAGES;

EID: 0142179494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. “Hearing lips and seeing voices,” Nature, 264, 746-748,1976.
2. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. “Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance,” Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 578-584, 1981.
3. Massaro, D.W., Perceiving Talking Faces: From Speech Perception to a Behavioral Principle, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
4. Massaro, D.W., Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.
5. Bosseler, A. N., Cohen, M. M., & Massaro, D. W. Influences on the McGurk effect. Unpublished paper, Perceptual Science Laboratory, 1998.
6. Denes, P. B. “On the statistics of spoken English.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of American, 35, 892-904, 1963.
7. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. “Perceiving aysnchronous bimodal speech in consonant-vowel and vowel syllables.” Speech Communication, 13, 127-134, 1993.
8. Smeele, P. M. T., Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., & Sittig, A. C. “Laterality in Visual Speech Perception,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1232-1242 1998.
9. Calvert, G. A., et al. “Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading,” Science, 276, 593-596, 1997.
10. Zeki, S. AVision of the Brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993.
11. Campbell, C. S., & Massaro, D. W. Temporal degradation of visible speech. Unpublished paper, Perceptual Science Laboratory, 1998.
12. Warren, R. M. “Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds,” Science, 167, 392-363, 1970.
13. Frost, R., Repp, B.H., & Katz, L. “Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print?” Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 741-755, 1988.
14. Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M., & Thompson, L.A. “Visible language in speech perception: Lipreading and reading,” Visible Language, 1, 8-31, 1988.
15. Barton, C. J., Cohen, M. M., & Massaro, D. W. The influence of written text on auditory experience. Unpublished paper, Perceptual Science Laboratory, 1998.
16. Grosjean, F. “Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm,” Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283, 1980.
17. De la Vaux, S. K., & Massaro, D. W. “The evaluation and integration of information in audiovisual gating of speech.” Unpublished paper, Perceptual Science Laboratory, 1998.