Assessing attitude towards prioritizing in healthcare in Iceland

Health Policy

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 135-146

  Oddsson, Kristjan ^a  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Disease severity; Healthcare; Iceland; Prioritizing; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; ICELAND; LICENSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; ORGANIZATION; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0142165070     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00211-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Honingsbaum F, Calltorp J, Ham C, Holmstöm S. Priority Setting Processes for Healthcare.
2. Norges Offentlige Utredninger. Retningslinjer for prioriteringer innen norsk helsetjeneste. NOU 1987:23.
3. Kitzhaber J.A. Prioritizing health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. British Medical Journal. 307:1993;373-377.
4. Government Committee on Choices in Health Care Report. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs, 1992.
5. Cumming J. Core services and priority-setting: the New Zealand experience. Health Policy. 29:1994;41-60.
6. Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Priorities in Health Care. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 1995.
7. Íslenskheilbrigoisáætlun. Reykjavík: Heilbrigois-og tryggingamálaráouneytio, 1992.
8. Magnússon T. Siofræoilegur grunnur styrkir ákvaroanir um forgangsröoun. Læknablaoio 81:1995;704-706.
9. Tillogur um forgangsrodun i heilbrigdismalum. Heilbrigdis-og trygginamalaraduneytid, 1997.
10. Um forgangsrodun i heilbrigdisthjonustu. Skyrsla nefndar Læknafelags Islands. The Icelandic Medical Journal 1997; 83/Fylgirit 35.
11. King D., Maynard A. Public opinion and rationing in the United Kingdom. Health Policy. 50:1999;39-53.
12. Kirkwood B.R. Essentials of Medical Statistics. 1994;221-224 Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
13. Nord E. Helsepolitikere ønsker ikke mest mulig helse per krone. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen. 113:1993;1371-1373.
14. Dean A.G., Dean J.A., Coulombier D., Brendel K.A., Smith D.C., Burton A.H., Dicker C., Sullivan K., Fagan R.F., Arner T.G. EPI INFO, Version 6: a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. 1994;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
15. SPSS Base 7.0 for Windows, USA 1996.
16. Mossialos E., King D. Citzens and rationing: analysis of a European survey. Health Policy. 49:1999;75-135.
17. Nord E. The relevance of health state after treatment in prioritizing between different patients. Journal of Medical Ethics. 19:1993;37-42.
18. International Research Associates (Europe). Eurobarometer 49. June 1998.
19. Halldorsson M., Baldursson M.B. Konnun um forgangsrodun i heilbrigdisthjonustunni. The Icelandic Medical Journal. 80:1994;482-483.
20. Fredriksen S., Arnesen T. Er helsevesenets viktigste oppgave å produsere helse. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen. 113:1993;3375-3377.
21. Olsen JA. Diskontering av helse: hva mener norske helseplanleggere? I: Piene H, red. Innsikt og oversikt. Helsetjenesteforskning 1987-1992. Oslo: NAVF/NORAS, 1992.