The politics of judicial selection

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 413-419

  Champagne, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; LEGAL SYSTEM; POLITICAL PROCESS;

EID: 0142156116     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1541-0072.00031     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adamany, D. (1969, March). The party variable in judges' voting: Conceptual notes and a case study, American Political Science Review, 63, 57-73.
2. American Judicature Society. (2002). Judicial selection in the states: Appellate and general jurisdiction courts. Chicago: American Judicature Society. Retrieved December 5, 2002, from http://www.ajs.org/selection.Jud%20Sel%20Chart-Oct%202002.pdf.
3. Champagne, A. (1998). Judicial selection in Texas. In A. Champagne, & E. Harpham (Eds.), Texas politics: A reader, 2nd ed. (pp. 88-104). New York: W.W. Norton.
4. Champagne, A. (2001a, June). Interest groups and judicial elections. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34, 1391-1409.
5. Champagne, A. (2001b, June). Political parties and judicial elections. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34, 1411-1427.
6. DuBois, P. (1980). From ballot to bench: Judicial elections and the quest for accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Ginsberg, B., Lowi, T., Weir, M., Champagne, A., Forshee, J., & Harpham, E. (2001). We the people (3rd ed., Texas ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
8. Goldberg, D., Holman, C., & Sanchez, S. (2002). The new politics of judicial elections. New York: Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved December 5, 2002, from http://www.justiceatstake.org/files/JASMoneyReport.pdf.
9. Hall, M. (2001, June). State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review, 95, 315-330.
10. Linde, H. (1988, September). Elective judges: Some comparative comments. Southern California Law Review, 61, 1995-2005.
11. Nagel, S. (1961, December). Political party affiliation and judges' decisions. American Political Science Review, 55, 843-850.
12. Nagel, S. (1962, February). Ethnic affiliations and judicial propensities. Journal of Politics, 24, 92-110.
13. Nagel, S. (1969). The legal process from a behavioral perspective. Homewood, II: Dorsey Press.
14. Nagel, S. (1975). Improving the legal process: Effect of alternatives. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15. National Summit on improving Judicial Selection. (2001, June). Call to action. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34, 1353-1359.
16. Pinello, Daniel (1999, September). Linking party to judicial ideology in American court: A meta-analysis. Justice System Journal, 20, 219-254.
17. Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2001).
18. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 122 S. Ct. 2528 (2002).
19. Schotland, R. (2001, Fall). Financing judicial elections, 2000: Change and challenge. Law Review of Michigan State University Detroit College of Law, 2001, 849-899.
20. Schotland, R. (2002, Summer). Republican Party of Minnesota v. White: Should judges be more like politicians? Judges' Journal, 41, 7-10.
21. Shuman, D., & Champagne, A. (1997, June/September). Removing the people from the legal process: The rhetoric and research on judicial selection and juries. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 242-258.