Comparison of Axial Dispersion and Tanks-in-Series Models for Simulating the Performance of Enzyme Reactors

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 5495-5505

  Abu Reesh, Ibrahim M ^a,b   Abu Sharkh, Basel F ^a  

^a KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYMES; HYDROLYSIS;

DISPERSION MODELS;

BIOREACTORS;

LACTOSE;

DISPERSION MODELING; ENZYME; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION; KINETICS; PLUG FLOW; STIRRED TANK;

ARTICLE; AXIAL DISPERSION MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; DISPERSION; ENZYME REACTOR; HYDROLYSIS; MICHAELIS MENTEN KINETICS; MODEL; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; TANKS IN SERIES MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0142152503     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie030131j     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buffham, B. A.; Gibilaro, L. G. A generalization of the tanks in series mixing model. AIChE J. 1968, 14, 805-806.
2. Stokes, R. L.; Nauman, E. B. Residence time distribution functions for stirred tanks in series. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1970, 48, 723-725.
3. Kobayashi, T.; Moo-Young, M. Backmixing and mass transfer in the design of immobilized enzyme reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1971, 13, 893-910.
4. Wen, C. Y.; Fan, L. T. Models for Flow Systems and Chemical Reactors; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1975.
5. Shinnar, R. Use of residence and contact time distributions in reactor design. In Chemical Reaction and Reactor Engineering; Carberry, J., Varma, A., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987.
6. Turner, J. R.; Mills, P. L. Comparison of axial dispersion and mixing cell models for design and simulation of Fischer-Tropsch slurry bubble column reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45 (8), 2317-2324.
7. Lee, T. T.; Wang, F. Y.; Newell, R. B. A generalized procedure for modeling and simulation of activated sludge plant using lumped-parameter approach. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 1997, 32 (1), 83-104.
8. Nardi, I. R.; Zaiat, M.; Foresti, E. Influence of the tracer characteristics on hydrodynamic models of packed bed reactors. Bioprocess Eng. 1999, 21 (5), 469-476.
9. Poughon, L.; Dussap, C. G.; Gros, J. B. Dynamic model of a nitrifying fixed bed column: Simulation of the biomass distribution of Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter and of transient behavior of the column. Bioprocess Eng. 1998, 20 (3), 209-221.
10. Komolprasert, V.; Ofoli, R. Y. A dispersion model for predicting the extent of starch liquefaction by B. licheniformis α-amylase during reactive extrusion. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991, 37, 681-690.
11. Elgeti, K. A new equation for correlating a pipe flow reactor with a cascade of mixed reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 5077-5080.
12. Kramers, H.; Alberda, G. Frequency response analysis of continuous flow systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1953, 2, 173-181.
13. Aris, R. End and beginnings in the mathematical modeling of chemical engineering systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1993, 48 (14), 2507-2517.
14. Van Hasselt, B. W.; Calis, H. P. A.; Sie, S. T.; Van den Bleek, C. M. Gas- and liquid-phase residence time distribution in the three levels of porosity reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 5047-5053.
15. Ponzi, E. N.; Gonzalez, M. G. Comparison between the dispersion and tanks in series models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1980, 35 (8), 1804-1806.
16. Dommeti, S. M. S.; Balakotaiah, V. On the limits of validity of effective dispersion models for bulk reactions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 6169-6186.
17. Fogler, H. S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
18. Danckwerts, P. V. Continuous flow systems, Distribution of residence times. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1953, 2 (1), 1-18.
19. Nauman, E. B. Chemical Reactor Design; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.
20. IMSL Software, Visual Numerics, Inc.: Houston, TX, 1987 (support@imsl.com).
21. Lortie, R. Evaluation of the performance of immobilized enzyme reactors with Michaelis-Menten kinetics. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1994, 60, 189-193.
22. Abu-Reesh, I. M. Predicting the performance of immobilized enzyme reactors using reversible Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Bioprocess Eng. 1997, 17 (3) 131-137.
23. Balakotaiah, V. Some comments on "A new equation for correlation of a pipe flow reactor with a cascade of mixed reactors". Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998, 53 (9), 1787.
24. Santos, A.; Ladero, M.; Garcia-Ochoa, F. Kinetic modeling of lactose hydrolysis by β-galactosidase from Kluyveromices fragillis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1998, 22, 558-567.
25. Abu-Reesh, I. M. Optimal design for CSTRs in series performing enzymatic lactose hydrolysis. Bioprocess Eng. 2000, 23 (6), 709-713.
26. Yang, S. T.; Okos, M. R. Effects of temperature on lactose hydrolysis by immobilized β-galactosidase in plug-flow reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 33, 873-885.