Production of π0 and η mesons at large transverse momenta in pp and p Be interactions at 530 and 800 GeV/c

Physical Review D

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  Apanasevich, L ^d,i   Bacigalupi, J ^a   Baker, W ^c   Begel, M ⁱ   Blusk, S ^h   Bromberg, C ^d   Chang, P ^e   Choudhary, B ^b   Chung, W H ^h   De Barbara, L ⁱ   DeSoi, W ⁱ   Dlugosz W ^e   Dunlea, J ⁱ   Engels Jr , E ^h   Fanourakis, G ⁱ   Ferbel, T ⁱ   Ftacnik, J ⁱ   Garelick, D ^e   Ginther, G ⁱ   Glaubman, M ^e   Gutierrez, P ^f   Hartman, K ^g   Huston, J ^d   Johnstone, C ^c   Kapoor, V ^b   Kuehler, J ^f   Lirakis, C ^e   Lobkowicz, F ⁱ   Lukens, P ^c   Mansour, J ⁱ   Maul, A ^d   Miller, R ^d   Oh, B Y ^g   Osborne, G ⁱ   Pellett, D ^a   Prebys, E ⁱ   Roser, R ⁱ   Shepard, P ^h   Shivpuri, R ^b   Skow, D ^c   Slattery, P ⁱ   Sorrell, L ^d   Striley, D ^e   Toothacker, W ^g   Tripathi, S M ^a   Varelas, N ⁱ   Weerasundara, D ^h   Whitmore, J J ^g   Yasuda, T ^e   Yosef, C ^e   Zielinski M ⁱ   Zutshi, V ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^c FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^g PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; CALCULATION; KINEMATICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHENOMENOLOGY; VELOCITY;

EID: 0142151523     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.052001     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. W.M. Geist et al., Phys. Rep. 197, 263 (1990).
2. N.A. McCubbin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 65 (1981).
3. F. Aversa et al., Nucl. Phys. B327, 105 (1989).
4. L. Apanasevich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2642 (1998).
5. L. Apanasevich et al., Phys. Rev. D 59, 074007 (1999).
6. L. Apanasevich et al., Phys. Rev. D 63, 014009 (2001).
7. J. Huston et al., Phys. Rev. D 51, 6139 (1995).
8. P. Aurenche et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 107 (1999).
9. P. Aurenche et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 347 (2000).
10. T, of each of the two colliding partons.
11. J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 472, 175 (2000).
12. J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 511, 19 (2001).
13. M. Fontannaz, J.P. Guillet, and G. Heinrich, Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 303 (2001).
14. M. Fontannaz, J.P. Guillet, and G. Heinrich, Eur. Phys. J. C 22, 303 (2001).
15. A. Zembrzuski and M. Krawczyk, Phys. Rev. D 64, 114017 (2001).
16. J.F. Owens, Phys. Rev. D 65, 034011 (2002).
17. G. Alverson et al., Phys. Rev. D 48, 5 (1993).
18. G. Alverson et al., Phys. Rev. D 45, 3899 (1992).
19. G. Alverson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2584 (1992).
20. G. Alverson et al., Phys. Rev. D 49, 3106 (1994).
21. D. Striley, Ph.D. thesis, University of Missouri at Columbia, 1996.
22. I. Kourbanis, Ph.D. thesis, Northeastern University, 1989.
23. D. Allspach et al., in Advances in Cyrogenic Engineering, edited by R.W. Fast (Plenum, New York, 1991), Vol. 37, p. 1495.
24. E. Engels, Jr. et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 279, 272 (1989).
25. C. Bromberg et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 307, 292 (1991).
26. These hybrid planes were installed after the commissioning run to provide improved vertex resolution.
27. The U, V wires were at angles of 37° and -53° relative to the vertical, respectively.
28. F. Lobkowicz et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 235, 332 (1985).
29. L. Apanasevich et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 417, 50 (1998).
30. G. Drake et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 269, 68 (1988).
31. C. Lirakis, in Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Electronics for Future Colliders (Le Croy Corp., Chestnut Ridge, New York, 1991), p. 35.
32. C. Benson, M.S. thesis, University of Rochester, 1989.
33. A. Gribushin et al., Phys. Rev. D 53, 4723 (1996).
34. A. Gribushin et al., Phys. Rev. D 62, 012001 (2000).
35. V. Koreshev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4294 (1996).
36. R. Jesik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 495 (1995).
37. L. Apanasevich et al., Phys. Rev. D 56, 1391 (1997).
38. D.E. Groom et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000).
39. L. Sorrell, Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University, 1995.
40. G. Osborne, Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, 1996.
41. F. Carminati et al., GEANT: Detector Description and Simulation Tool, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013, 1993.
42. This is in contrast to the analysis of data from the commissioning run where we used just empirical parametrizations of electromagnetic showers in simulating the EMLAC response.
43. Fermilab Computing Department, CPS Software User's Guide, FNAL GA0009, 1993.
44. G. Marchesini et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 67, 465 (1992), HERWIG v5.6.
45. T. Sjöstrand, PYTHIA 5.6 and JETSET 7.3 Physics and Manual, CERN-TH.6488/92, 1992.
46. M. Bonesini et al., Z. Phys. C 37, 39 (1987).
47. G. Donaldson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 917 (1978).
48. G.D. Lafferty and T.R. Wyatt, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 355, 541 (1995).
49. X.-N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A661, 609 (1999).
50. Private communication with Xin-Nian Wang regarding the use of this program at these beam energies.
51. H.L. Lai et al., Phys. Rev. D 55, 1280 (1997).
52. J. Binnewies, B.A. Kniehl, and G. Kramer, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4947 (1995).
53. B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, and B. Pötter, Nucl. Phys. B582, 514 (2000).
54. R.P. Feynman, R.D. Field, and G.C. Fox, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3320 (1978).
55. M. Fontannaz and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B132, 457 (1978).
56. A.P. Contogouris et al., Nucl. Phys. B179, 461 (1981).
57. A.P. Contogouris et al., Phys. Rev. D 32, 1134 (1985).
58. J. Collins and D. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B193, 381 (1981);
59. J. Collins and D. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B213, 545 E (1983);
60. J. Collins, D. Soper, and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. 109B, 388 (1982).
61. S. Catani et al., J. High Energy Phys. 03, 025 (1999).
62. S. Catani, M.L. Mangano, and P. Nason, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 024 (1998).
63. H.-L. Lai and H.-N. Li, Phys. Rev. D 58, 114020 (1998).
64. E. Laenen, G. Sterman, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4296 (2000).
65. N. Kidonakis and J.F. Owens, Phys. Rev. D 61, 094004 (2000).
66. N. Kidonakis and J.F. Owens, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054019 (2001).
67. E. Laenen, G. Oderda, and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B 438, 173 (1998).
68. N. Kidonakis, G. Oderda, and G. Sterman, hep-ph/9805279.
69. N. Kidonakis, G. Oderda, and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B525, 299 (1998).
70. C.E. Fink, hep-ph/0105276.
71. J.F. Owens, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 465 (1987).
72. A.C. Clark et al., Nucl. Phys. B160, 397 (1979).
73. A.L.S. Angelis et al., Phys. Lett. 97B, 163 (1980).
74. Y. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 034903 (2002).