New directions in binational water resource management in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands

Social Science Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 555-572

  Brown, Christopher ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142139146     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00068-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Beach, H. L., Hamner, J., Hewitt, J. J., Kaufman, E., Kurki, A., Oppenheimer, J. A., Wolf, A. T. (2000). Transboundary freshwater dispute resolution: Theory, practice and annotated references. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
2. Bernauer T. Explaining success and failure in international river management Aquatic Sciences 64 2002 619-641
3. Blatter, J., & Ingram, H. (2001). Reflections on water: New approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brown, C. (2002). Research into binational watershed councils (Consejos Binacionales de las Cuencas) as instruments for conflict resolution in the Upper Santa Cruz Watershed. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy Issue Paper, The University of Arizona.
5. Brown, C., Greenlee, J., & Hurd, B. (2002). Vulnerability of borderland water resources: Developing indicators for selected watersheds on the U.S. Mexico border-The Paso del Norte Region. Successful funding proposal submitted to the Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy.
6. Brown C. Mumme S. Consejos De Cuencas: An institutional option for transboundary water management on the U.S. Mexico border. International Review of Comparative Public Policy, 11 115-140.
7. Brown C. Mumme S. Applied and theoretical aspects of binational watershed councils (Consejos de Cuencas) in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands Paper published in a special issue of Natural Resources Journal, on Water Issues in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands 404 2000 895-929
8. Browning-Aiken, A., Brown, C., Varady, R., & Moreno, D. (2002). Comparative analysis of water resources management on the U.S.-Mexico border: The case of the San Pedro Basin. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Transboundary Water Management, la Associación Mexicana Hidraulica. Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
9. City of Tucson. (1997). Mayor and Council Memorandum, Approval of the Santa Cruz Advisory Committee for the Multiple Benefit Water Project and Public Involvement in a Downtown Plans Review Process. Issued 13 October 1997.
10. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA). (1992). La Ley de Aguas Nacionales y su Reglamentos, Segunda Edición. Distrito Federal, Mexico: CNA.
11. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA). (1997). La Ley de Aguas Nacionales y su Reglamentos, Tercera Edición. Distrito Federal, Mexico: CNA.
12. Dinar A. Wolf A. International markets for water and the potential for regional cooperation: Economic and political perspectives in the western Middle East Economic Development and Cultural Change 431 1994 43-66
13. Draper S. International duties and obligations for transboundary water sharing Journal of Water Resources Planing and Management 1236 1997 344-349
14. Englert P. Brown C. Placchi C. Gersberg R. Geographic Information System (GIS) characterization of metal loading in the binational Tijuana River Watershed Journal of Borderland Studies 142 1999 81-91
15. Friends of the Santa Cruz River (FOSCR). (1998). The ripple: Newsletter for the Santa Cruz Valley River partnership, June, July, and August issues. Tubac, AZ: FoSCR.
16. Friends of the Santa Cruz River (FOSCR). (1999). Friends of the Santa Cruz River membership brochure. Tubac, AZ: FoSCR.
17. Garcia, J. (2003 April). Telephone interview by author with Dr. Jose Garcia, Director of the New Mexico State University Center for Latin American and Border Studies and participant at the Roundtable on Water Markets convened by the University of California, San Diego Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies. Mexico City, Mexico.
18. Gersberg, R., Brown, C., Zambrano, V., Worthington, K., & Weis, D. (2000). Quality of urban runoff in the Tijuana River Watershed, book chapter in the U.S.-Mexico border environment: Water issues along the U.S.-Mexican Border (pp. 31-45). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
19. Gleick P. The changing water paradigm: A look at twenty-first century water resources development Water International 251 2000 127-138
20. Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB). (2000). Fourth Report of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board to the President and Congress of the United States (USEPA document No. EPA-130-R-00-001). Washington, DC: USEPA.
21. Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB). (2003). USEPA website hosted by the Office of Cooperative Environmental Management, USEPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ocempage/gneb-page.htm.
22. Herrera, A. (2002, January 22). La CILA y la Frontera de Mexico y Los Estados Unidos. Presentation given in the Ciudad Juárez offices of CILA 2002.
23. Kaiser R.A. Phillips L.M. Dividing the waters: Water marketing as a conflict resolution strategy in the Edwards Aquifer region Natural Resources Journal 382 1998 411-444
24. Kouros, G. (2002). Comments made in a BECCNET posting dated 7 October 2002 entitled, "Comments on draft Border 201 plan" [On-line]. Available at BECCNETλistserv.arizona.edu.
25. Lemarquand, D. G. (1977). International Rivers: The Politics of Cooperation. Vancouver, B.C.: Westwater Research Centre, University of British Colombia.
26. Lemarquand D. The International Joint Commission and changing Canada-United States boundary relations Natural Resources Journal 334 1993 59-91
27. Osborn K. United States-Mexico transboundary aerial photography and mapping initiative Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 6411 1998 1085-1088
28. Placchi, C. (1998). Land use and water quality in the upper reaches of the Tijuana River. Unpublished masters thesis, Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
29. Rio Grande/Río Bravo Basin Coalition (RGRBBC). (2003). Website hosted by the RGRBBC. Available at http://www.rioweb.org/index.html, accessed 15 May 2003.
30. Santa Cruz River Alliance (SCRA). (1999). Webpage for the SCRA. Available at http://www.azstarnet.com/nonprofit/scra/index.htm, accessed 17 May 2003.
31. Santos M.A. Rodriques R. Correia F.N. On European water resources information policy Water Resources Management 11 1997 305-322
32. Schmandt A. Binational water issues in the Rio Grande/Río Bravo Basin Water Policy 4 2002 137-155
33. Spalding M. Commentary Perspectivas 22 1996 16-17
34. Speener, S. (2003, April 8). Telephone interview conducted by author with Ms. Sally Speener. Public Affairs Officer with the International Boundary and Water Commission.
35. Spenner-Norman, E., & Melious, J. O. (2002). Transboundary environmental management: A study of the abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer in British Columbia and western Washington (Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, 6 March 2003). New Orleans, LA.
36. Streeten P. Components of a future development strategy: The importance of human development Finance & Development 364 1999 30-33
37. Torres, T. (2003, May 14). EMAIL correspondence between author and Tomas Torres, USEPA Region 9 staff person working in the USEPA San Diego Border Liaison Office.
38. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). U.S.-Mexico Border XXI Program 1997-1998 implementation plans (EPA 160-R-98-001). Washington, DC: USEPA
39. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and la Secretaria de Desarrollo Urbano y Ecologia (SEDUE). (1992). Integrated environmental plan for the Mexican-U.S. border area. Washington, DC: USEPA/SEDUE.
40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and la Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). (1996). U.S.-Mexico Border XXI Framework Document (USEPA document No. EPA 160-R-96-003). Washington, DC: USEPA/SEMARNAP.
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and la Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). (2001). U.S.-Mexico Border XXI Program: Progress report 1996-2000 (USEPA document No. EPA 160-R-00-001). Washington, DC: USEPA/SEMARNAP.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and la Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2002). Border 2012: U.S.-Mexico Environmental Program (USEPA document No. EPA 160-D-02-001). Washington, DC: USEPA/SEMARNAT.
43. United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC). (1995). Minute 294-Facilities Planning Program for the Solution of Border Sanitation Problems. Signed 24 November, 1995 in El Paso, Texas.
44. United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC). (1999). Minute 301-Joint Colorado River Water Conveyance Planning Level Study for the San Diego, California-Tijuana, Baja California Region. Signed 14 October, 1999 in Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.
45. United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC). (2000). Minute 306-Conceptual Framework for U.S.-Mexico Studies for Future Recommendations Concerning the Riparian and Estuarine Ecology of the Limitrophe Section of the Colorado River and its Associated Delta. Signed, 12 December 2000 in El Paso, Texas.
46. United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC). (2003). Public Affairs Division posting on the IBWC webpage describing the IBWC Citizen's Forums. Available at http://www.ibwc.state.gov/html/foreignfairs.html, accessed 14 May 2003.
47. United States of America and the United Mexican States. (1983). Agreement between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on cooperation for the protection and improvement of the environment in the border area (La Paz Agreement, TIAS No. 10827). Signed 14 August 1983 in La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
48. United States of America and the United Mexican States. (1993, November 4). Agreement between the United States of America and the government of the United Mexican States concerning the establishment of a border environment cooperation commission and a North American Development Bank.
49. Varady, R. (2002). Comments made in a BECCNET posting dated 7 October 2002 entitled, "Beginning a dialogue: Critiques of Border 2012" [On-line]. Available at BECCNETλistserv.arizona.edu.
50. Varady R. Colnic D. Merideth R. Sprouse T. The U.S.-Mexico border environment cooperation commission: Collected perspectives on the first two years Journal of Borderland Studies 112 1996 89-119
51. Vera, B. (2003, February 19). Telephone interview conducted by the author with Ms. Beatriz Vera, Executive Director of the Rio Grande/Río Bravo Basin Coalition.
52. Wolf A. International water conflict resolution: Lessons from comparative analysis Water Resources Development 133 1997 333-365
53. Wolf A.Yoffe S. Giordano M. International waters: Identifying basins at risk Water Policy 5 2003 29-60