An Optimal Design Approach to Criterion-Referenced Computerized Testing

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 97-110

  Wiberg, Marie ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Criterion referenced tests; Efficiency; Power maximization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142138743     PISSN: 10769986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/10769986028002097     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Atkinson, A. C., & Donev, A. N. (1992). Optimum experimental designs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord, and M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Ferguson, T. S. (1996). A course in large sample theory. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
4. Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J. (1983). A Comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In D. J. Weiss. (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
5. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
6. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence: Erlbaum.
7. Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: overview and introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 187-194.
8. Reckase, M. D. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-255). New York: Academic Press.
9. Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D. (1996). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
10. van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.
11. van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), (pp. 1-26). Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing. In W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), (pp. 289-309) Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.