Have fixed-prosthodontic impressions become easier?

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 134, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1121-1123

  Christensen, Gordon J ^a  

^a CLINICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHER DERIVATIVE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILICONE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADVERTIZING; BIOSAFETY; DECISION MAKING; DENTIST; DENTISTRY; GINGIVA; HYDROCOLLOID; HYDROPHILICITY; INJECTION; POLYMERIZATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLISHING; SHORT SURVEY; SOFT TISSUE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; HUMAN;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; GINGIVA; HUMANS;

EID: 0142124748     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0330     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Christensen GJ. Improving the quality of fixed prosthodontic services. JADA 2000;131:1631-2.
2. Christensen GJ. Day-to-day fixed prosthodontics: a fast, easy, predictable approach. JADA 1992;123(11):91-2.
3. Christensen GJ. Complex fixed and implant prosthodontics: making nearly fool-proof impressions. JADA 1992;123(12):69-70.
4. Christensen GJ. Now is the time to change to custom impression trays. JADA 1994;125:619-20.
5. Christensen GJ. What category of impression material is best for your practice? JADA 1997;128:1026-8.