Simulation of continuous stirred ultrafiltration process: An approach based on analytical solution coupled with turbulent back transport

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1135-1141

  Bhattacharjee, Chiranjib ^a   Datta, Siddhartha ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Back transport; Flux; Membrane separation; Rejection; Simulation; Stirred cell; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MASS TRANSFER; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

TRANSPORT FLUX;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CELLULOSE ACETATE; MACROGOL 6000;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PERMEABILITY; PREDICTION; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; TURBULENT FLOW; ULTRAFILTRATION; VOLUMETRY; WATER TRANSPORT;

EID: 0142123006     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.912     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kozinski AA and Lightfoot EN, Protein ultrafiltration: A general example of boundary layer filtration. AIChE J 18:1030 (1972).
2. Wijmans JG, Nakao S, Van Den Berg JWA, Troelstra FR and Smolders CA, Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 22:117-135 (1985).
3. Blatt WF, Dravid A, Michaels AS and Nelsen LM, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: Cause, consequences and control techniques, in Membrane Science and Technology, ed by Flinn JF Plenum Press, New York, NY, p47 (1970).
4. Wijmans JG, Nako S, and Smolders CA, Flux limitation in ultrafiltration: Osmotic pressure model and gel layer model. J Membr Sci 20:115-124 (1984).
5. Chudacek MW and Fane AG, The dynamics of polarization in unstirred and stirred ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 21:145-160 (1984).
6. Van Oers CW, Vorstman MAG, Muijselaar WGHM an Kerkhof PJAM, Unsteady state flux behavior in relation to the presence of a gel layer. J Membr Sci 73:231-246 (1992).
7. Churchill RV, Operational Mathematics. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd, Tokyo (1972).
8. Nakao S and Kimura S, Analysis of solute rejection in ultrafiltration. J Chem Eng Jpn 14:32 (1981).
9. Bhattacharjee C and Bhattacharya PK, Prediction of limiting flux in ultrafiltration of Kraft black liquor. J Membr Sci 72:137 (1992).
10. Bhattacharjee C, Prediction of limiting flux in ultrafiltration of Kraft black liquor. MTech Thesis, IIT Kanpur (1991).
11. Flory PJ, Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (1953).
12. Van Krevelen DW and Hoftjer PJ, Properties of Polymers. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1977).
13. Sherwood TK, Pigford RL and Wilke CR, Mass Transfer. McGraw Hill, New York (1975).
14. Finlayson BA, Non-linear Analysis in Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York (1980).
15. Press WH, Flannery BD, Teukolsky SA and Vetterling WT, Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p523 (1986).
16. Bhattacharjee C, Studies on mass transfer during ultrafiltration of solute through asymmetric membrane. PhD Thesis, Jadavpur University (1998).