Optimal technological choices in meeting Australian energy policy goals

Energy Economics

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 691-712

  Graham, Paul W ^a   Williams, David J ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Energy; Greenhouse gas emissions; Integrated modeling

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT;

CARBON EMISSION; ENERGY POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 0142122923     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-9883(03)00053-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Australian Greenhouse Office, 1999. National emissions trading: Issuing the permits, Discussion paper no. 2, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
2. Australian Greenhouse Office, 2002. National greenhouse gas inventory 2000: Fact sheet 1, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
3. Australian Journal of Mining, 1999. Lignite, Australian Journal of Mining, April, 25-27
4. Beck, T., Jolly, L., Loncar, T., 1991. Supply response in the Australian black coal industry, ABARE Technical Paper 91.1, Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra
5. Bohringer C. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling Energy Econ. 20 1998 233-248
6. Cocks, D., Poldy, F., Foran, B., 2000. A comprehensive simulation model of energy transformations and transfers in the Australian economy, Working Paper Series 00/11, CSIRO Resources Futures Program, Canberra
7. Council of Australian Governments Energy Market Review Panel, 2002. Towards a truly national and efficient energy market, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
8. Diesendorf M. Australian economic models of greenhouse abatement Environ. Sci. Policy 1 1998 1-12
9. Electric Power Research Institute and US Department of Energy, 1997. Renewable energy technology characterizations, Topical Report TR-109496, Department of Energy, Washington
10. Energy Information Administration, 1998. The national energy modeling system: An overview 1998, DOE/EIA-0581(98), Department of Energy, Washington
11. Energy Information Administration, 2000. Assumptions to the annual energy outlook 2000 (AEO2000): With projections to 2020, DOE/EIA-0554(2000), Department of Energy, Washington
12. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program, 1997. New directions in energy modeling: Summary of annex V (1993-1995), ETSAP-97-1, International Energy Agency, Paris
13. Foran, B., Crane, D., Poldy, F., Phipp, S., Slesser, M., 1998. The OzECCO embodied energy model of Australia's physical economy: model description and calibration, CSIRO Resource Futures Program, Canberra
14. Gielen, D.J., 1999. Materializing dematerialization: integrated energy and materials systems engineering for greenhouse gas emission mitigation, Ph.D. Thesis, Design for Sustainability Program, Delft
15. Gritsevskyi A. Nakicenovic N. Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change Energy Policy 28 2000 907-921
16. Grubler A. Nakicenovic N. Victor D.G. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change Energy Policy 27 1999 247-280
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, New York
18. Jacobsen H.K. Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy-economy modeling: The case of Denmark Energy Econ. 20 1998 443-461
19. Juniper, L., 1999. Electric power from competitive sources, Report by Ultra-systems Technology for QTHERM, Queensland Department of Mines and Energy, Brisbane
20. Kahn R.D. Siting struggles: The unique challenge of permitting renewable energy power plants Electricity J. 13 2000 21-33
21. Kram T. Seebregts A. Schaeffer G.J.et al. Technology dynamics in energy systems models with perfect foresight Int. J. Global Energy Issues 14 2000 48-64
22. Kydes, A., 1999. Modeling technology learning in the national energy modeling system, EIA/DOE-0607(99), Department of Energy, Washington
23. McDonald A. Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies Energy Policy 29 2001 255-261
24. Naughten, B., Noble, K., 2000. Meeting the mandated renewable electricity target: Some results from 'least cost' modeling, ABARE Conference Paper 2001.6, ABARE, Canberra
25. Oko-Institut, 1999. Environmental Manual for Power Development: EM 1.4, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur tecnische Zusammenarbeit GmbH, Eschborn
26. Paffenbarger, J.A., Bertel, E., 1998. Results from the OECD report on international projections of electricity generating costs, International Energy Agency, Paris
27. Queensland Government, 2000. Queensland energy policy: A cleaner energy strategy, Queensland Government, Brisbane
28. Redding Energy Management and RMIT, 1999. 2% renewables target in power supplies: Potential for Australian capacity to expand to meet the target, report to the Australian Greenhouse Office, Redding Energy Management, Richmond
29. Seebregts, A.J., Kram, T., Schaeffer, G.J., et al., 1999. Endogenous technological change in energy system models: Synthesis of experience with ERIS, MARKAL and MESSAGE, ECN-C-99-025, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten
30. Slesser M. ECCO User Manual Part 1 third ed 1992 The Resource Use Institute Edinburgh
31. Wilson D. Swisher J. Exploring the gap: Top-down versus bottom-up analyses of the costs of mitigating global warming Energy Policy 21 1993 249-263
32. WindStats Newsletter, 1999. Bringing down the cost of wind, WindStats Newsletter 12, 6-8